[QUOTE=Airman Doors, USAF]
I disagree with your assessment of Ross Youngs, at the minimum. He died in the prime of his life from Bright’s disease, and the numbers he put up were more than adequate to merit inclusion if you factor in the idea that he would only have been more noteworthy had he not died.
The other choices on your list are also more than acceptable when you consider that Roger Bresnahan and Rabbit Maranville are also in the Hall.
[/QUOTE]
As for Youngs, his batting average looks superficially impressive but in context he was, to use a quickie comparison, not as good a hitter as Bobby Abreu. If Bobby Abreu died tomorrow, would anyone seriously consider him a Hall of Fame candidate? Brian Giles is a much better player than either Abreu or Youngs, in a career (so far) of essentially the same length; would you elect him?
I mean, Youngs was a really good player and all, but a Hall of Famer?
As to Maranville, hey, I’m not saying the Frisch selections are the only bad ones. In defense of those choices, though, I would point out that the perception of Maranville during his career, as well as at the time he was voted in, was that he was a defensive genius of unparalleled proportions, the Ozzie Smith of his day. A shortstop of that level of defensive skill who played for 23 years WOULD be a Hall of Famer.
The Win Shares method credits Maranville with 302 shares, which is something like 16th or 17th all time among shortstops, putting him essentially at the cusp. You can construct an argument that Maranville is in fact a better choice than the Frisch selections; you could also construct one that he’s not. Maranville’s contribution to baseball is not easily seen in the stat line; he was primarily a defensive whiz, and the stats such as we have them do appear to support the belief that he was a brilliant defensive player, but that’s hard to judge for sure now. Maranville was also a character of considerable importance, and indeed was one of the most beloved players of all time, and that’s worth something I think, but how much, who knows? Anyway…
I think what’s important here is that whether or not you agree with the Maranville choice, at least he was a consensus pick by the bulk of the baseball media in 1954. Maranville, unlike the Frischies, was elected by the BBWAA, whose opinion at the time was entirely in keeping with what everyone said about him when he was playing. So at least Maranville got his plaque the hard way; by convincing about 84% of hundred of eligible voters that he should be in. The Frisch selections got in through a back door process due almost entirely to one man’s nepotism and force of will.
The Bresnahan choice - well, there’s the Veterans Committee again.