Update:
We saw the doctor today. He walked through what was known to date, and in that process, addressed most of @Qadgop_the_Mercotan ’ s questions – some by asking my sister, and others by looking at her record. He seemed very engaged and smart, and he was very kind, with a good “bedside manner”.
This has been going on for a lot longer than I realized.
My sister had a heart CT in 2022 to do calcium scoring, and these lesions weren’t noted at the time. She had another in Mar of 2023 after an abnormal EKG, when this was first noticed. (There some calcification near the heart, but it’s basically fine.) A follow-up ultrasound didn’t spot it. So she had an MRI in August, with contrast agent, which did.
It’s 2 or maybe 3 lesions. They are not cystic. The two that were imaged clearly were 1.6CM and 2CM, and both are on the lobe of the liver close to the heart.
This led to a failed attempt at a biopsy – the doctor practicing in a suburban clinic said it was too close to the heart for him to biopsy, and recommended a surgical biopsy.
That’s when my sister called in the affiliated major urban hospital. The guy she spoke to today is in their liver transplant unit. He’s pretty sure that they have the tools to do a biopsy. Unfortunately, the hospitals don’t natively share images (they do share test results and such) so my sister brought a CD from the suburban hospital with the relevant images. Unfortunately, a system was down and they couldn’t upload them, so this doctor only read the descriptions, and could not see the actual scans.
There don’t seem to be any other liver abnormalities. The rest of the liver looks okay, and her latest blood tests show normal liver enzymes, and a lot of other normal blood test results. She has a few years of normal liver enzymes in her record.
She does not have cirrhosis, and probably doesn’t have hepatis, although the doctor ordered tests today for Hep A, B, and C, because “you are in a liver clinic, we always do that. And if you aren’t immune, we may recommend vaccines for Hep A and B.” He also said he would check for AFP, a tumor marker. He said with her solid history of normal liver function he wouldn’t be doing a large battery of other blood tests.
The doctor asked about a family history (lung and kidney cancer, no history of liver problems) and also asked if she ever took hormones, which can be associated with liver problems. She hasn’t, but as a young adult she saw an endocrinologist because she was abnormally sensitive to the normal levels of hormones in her body. (She grew heavy sideburns despite having ordinary female levels of testosterone, for instance.) He also asked about alcohol, tobacco, and other recreational drugs. Or maybe the woman who did intake and took her pulse and stuff did that. Anyway, she probably drinks less than a bottle of wine in a year, and that’s it, so nothing there.
He says that the first round of doctors ruled out a hemangioma and invasive cancer, but it could be focal nodular hyperplasia, or a hepatic adenoma, and there is a chance that it’s a cancer that doesn’t yet look invasive on the scans. (or something weirder, I guess, but that’s what he’s thinking.) He says that when there’s a lesion in a liver that has a lot of other damage, they think cancer, but lesions in apparently healthy livers are usually benign. But the fact that it’s (at least) two lesions increases the odds of cancer.
His plan is:
- He’s bringing her case to the “tumor board”, which is a multidisciplinary group of everyone in the liver transplant unit. They will look at the scan together and discuss what they think she should do. That will meet in 2 weeks.
- He’s scheduled her for a biopsy. “It can be cancelled if the board doesn’t think it’s needed, but I expect they’ll want to do it”. He thinks they can do a CT guided biopsy even if it’s too hard to do an ultrasound-guided biopsy. But also, the folks who do the biopsies will be at that board, and can judge if they can do it.
- He’s scheduled her for a follow-up appointment in 7 weeks, after these would have been done. (The people who do a biopsy will also talk to her, shortly after that happens.)
- He’s scheduled her for a repeat MRI in 3 months. Again, it can be canceled, but many of the possibilities would suggest checking to see if the thing is growing, or just sitting there.
And I guess we’ll know more after whatever combination of these things actually happens.
Oh, and the two questions he didn’t explicitly hit that I asked were whether the lesion was cystic or solid, and what sort of symptoms she should be watching for. He said if she gets bloated, her belly fills with fluid, she develops jaundice, or she has abdominal pain that is abnormal for her (so not her usual GERD symptoms) that she should check back.