Let’s see one! How about one about Obama’s reversal regarding denial of benefits to the veterans? Does his initial policy reveal his hatred for our servicemen, or does his reversal expose his craven hypocrisy? Enjoy the deficit, moron.
They are all legitimate points of debate, but since you seem unwilling to support them with anything other than repeated assertion, we can safely dismiss them as unfounded opinion.
This post contains so many falsehoods, and is evidence of so much malicious stupidity, that it instantly reveals that you are not worthy of engaging. Like I said, leave real debate to the adults, since you are clearly incapable of anything better than what I might read in the YouTube comments section.
So you are saying that Obama did NOT propose cutting veteran’s benefits? How about a cite
Or another cite
Or are you proposing that he did not backpedal on his stupidity? cite
Just asking!
How about, “**Stan Shmenge’s **casting of the debate in post 101 showed such well-poisoning and partisan douchebaggery that engaging with him would clearly be a pointless exercise. It is better to point and laugh.”
Though there is little point in explaining this to you, what people like you fail to understand is that liberals on this board are happy to engage with thoughtful conservatives. But people who show no interest in engaging in good faith debate are not really worth the time. That’s why, for example, people argue with Bricker, but just make fun of Clothahump. And you.
And there you have it in a nutshell. The last argument of those bereft of facts. The intellectual equivalent of farting in the wind. My children use this response when they have no response, and think they have just delivered the ultimate argument. It says much about your thought processes.
What do you want to bet he’s making the “W” handsign right after he posts?
Bricker is just as impaired in the good-faith department. People engage him because his articulateness and his mastery at disingenuous framing might otherwise convince the more casual readers that he has a good, even superior position.
Well, it’s superior to your’s.
Hmmm? :dubious: Explanation and example or two, please?
(His knowledge of the correct use of apostrophes, and mine, is superior to yours, btw)
**Bricker **has actually done a volte-face with respect to some important positions (such as, IIRC, gay marriage). I can’t think of a better indicator that someone is debating in good faith than that they actually are persuaded to change their mind sometimes.
Well, I never had to do an about face on gay marriage, because I have always supported equal rights for all. I am NOT a social conservative. I am here to point out the problems with the new administration. And I will continue to do so.
This is an absolutely vital role. Shame you’re so crap at it.
I daresay their cause is helped by you being on the other side of it.
No, you’re just a dumbass.
I’m bumping this to keep it on the front page. Why? Just because Stan Shmenge is such a swell guy! He’s right about the nutmeg laws.