State Quarters and other themed coin issues; why can't there be similarly themed currency too?

By all accounts, the State Quarters program was a great success, and I have little doubt that the current America The Beautiful series will do the same. The old quarters, with the centrally placed eagle, had all the charm and interest of a new Federal courthouse; by contrast, the recent commemorative series have featured a wide variety of interesting subjects presented in interesting designs. Similar commemorative runs are doing the same for pennies and nickels, though I’m unaware of anything in the works for the dime–which sorely needs to lose the fasces design on the back. I mean, a fasces? Really? Somebody actually thought that was appropriate for a coin designed to honor FDR?

On the other hand, nothing like this has been proposed for the currency. There have been several rounds of security enhancements, including the introduction of visible watermarks which seems like a rather retro approach. But during this process the the subjects depicted on the backs of the $5-, $10, $20, and $100-bills have never varied, and the depictions of the the Treasury and the White House have actually lost most of the visual interest they had until the early 1990s. Especially the Treasury building; the dramatic corner perspective view gave the picture depth, instead of having it look like a postage stamp. Today’s version, instead, is little more than an architect’s front elevation, without any attempt at perspective or depth. The old twenty used to show, in addition to the curved South Portico, a good deal of tree foliage which, in my opinion, made the building look more like an actual house, albeit a very large one. The new ones show the plain North Portico instead, with little foliage. (I do give some props for the looping lantern chains, though)

Enough, I say! Why can’t we have a State Currency series? The possibilities would be limitless, especially if there could be the option to use vertically oriented designs (the Empire State Building or Old Faithful, anyone? How about an Apollo liftoff for Florida?). Or instead of states, the theme could be events in American history, as opposed to just dull views of buildings where stuff happened. I hasten to add that it’s not the buildings themselves I object to, but the remarkably lifeless and flat depictions thereof.

Is this just something that never made it to the table, or is there a definite reason Treasury and the FRB won’t consider such a move? If so, does result from the USD’s position as an international medium of exchange, and the concern that radically different obverse designs would cause an international financial panic of some kind?

American paper currency has lots of security and anti-counterfeiting measures built into it. Consistency of the look and feel of genuine bills is one of the most obvious ones. Having lots of different designs floating around for different denominations would be too confusing in a world where some people still don’t think $2 bills are real. It won’t ever happen for that reason alone at least not without a complete redesign of the whole concept. Maybe we could someday have plastic currency with other sophisticated anti-counterfeiting measures like Australia does but what you propose isn’t practical as long as we keep making the same basic, very conservative style of paper currency. I am sure that someone would love to pay for international goods with their big bag of the really cool, brand new ‘East Dakota’ dollars if given the chance.

Plus, it would really screw up all the vending machines already out there. In short, it just isn’t worth it.

There hasn’t actually been a fasces on the dime since they stopped making “Mercury” dimes back in 1945. The current dime has a torch and olive and oak branches. (Reverse of the “Mercury” dime. Reverse of the Roosevelt dime.)

And of course a fasces is a perfectly cromulent and very old symbol of the Rule of Law and such, and is still found in all sorts of non-“fascist” contexts, including in the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives.

The commemorative quarter program was largely a moneymaking initiative, but that depended on people taking the coins out of circulation; at 25 cents, it’s not even a big deal for kids to collect them. But how many people are going to put aside 50 5-dollar bills just for fun? Or 10-dollar bills?

Not many, I grant you, but I’d think many people would be willing to hold on to a small number of designs they particularly like. And because the denomination is higher it wouldn’t have to be nearly as many for the Fed to realize a profit on the venture.

Maybe it would work with $1 bills. If we have to keep those around, at least they could be interesting.

My mistake; sto corrigi.

On this point, I would have agreed up until about twenty years ago, that is, prior to the introduction of “obvious” security features like watermarks and color-shifting numerals. Until then, the designs and engraving details were pretty much the only security features except possibly for some requiring special tools to verify.

Umm, yeah. I see your point, at least with regard to the fifty states, but with a smaller set of variations, not so much. After all, has anyone been caught in East Africa trying to pass “ten dollar bills” with the Lincoln Memorial on the reverse? (On that score, I think the more recent designs would be more prone to counterfeiting, given that the Treasury Building and White House on the ten and twenty now look pretty much the same.)

This I didn’t know. Do vending machines need to read the back as well as the front?

Sorry for the slight zombification here, but that’s still allowed, right?

In suggesting commemorative currency designs, I wasn’t thinking so much of truly collectible rarities, but rather along the lines of the bicentennial commemorative coins minted from 1974 through '76, which were issued instead of the usual designs and intended for general circulation rather than collecting.

In the same way, we wouldn’t be collecting fifty $5 or $10 bills, but simply using them as ordinary money, saving or spending as we see fit.

The argument about anti-counterfeiting and the acceptability in machines still applies. Not practical.

I don’t know about other people, but “collection fatigue” set in for me after the state quarters program ended. When they started extending it to landmarks in states, I said “Oh, fuck that noise! I think I’m done with coin collecting.” I’m sure I’m not the only who who just can’t be bothered to pay much attention to quarters anymore.

There are stories of people not recognizing two-dollar bills as legitimate. I remember one such story from a few years ago of a guy who was arrested for spending some of them at a Best Buy in Maryland. So I think it’s a bad idea, as samclem says, to muck with the design of currency notes so that people are unfamiliar with ones presented to them.

We should have an official program to allow people to print their own custom currency with any picture of their choice on front and back, just like we already do with postage stamps. It works for stamps, so why not for folding money?

All 'merkins remember 20-ish! years ago when the first redesign of the new bills came out, starting with the $20. This was the first bill with some color and a large off-center portrait rather than the small centered portrait in the oval border.

About 2 *years *later I tried to spend one of the new 20s at a store in Alaska. The college kid behind the cash register, and the 60-something owner *both *did not recognize it as US currency.

It was only a chorus of my fellow tourists that convinced them it was real.