statues of heroes on horseback query

I was idly looking at a statue of a general on horseback today.( the general, not me )

The horse had one leg raised and the general was brandishing
a sabre.

A fellow onlooker then informede me thus:

  1. One leg raised- person was wounded in battle

  2. Two legs raised- person killed in battle

  3. No legs raised- person died a natural death ( and, presumably,
    the horse.)

Have I been pranked, or is this for real?

Take a look here: http://www.snopes.com/military/statue.htm

Seems I’d read about this at snopes…
…and I had (it’s not true)

Snopes.com - equestrian statues

silly me.

forgot all about snopes.

thank you

The thing that has always bothered me about this factoid - even before I discovered it was blatantly false - was the contradiction here:

One leg raised- person was wounded in battle

and

No legs raised- person died a natural death

Surely, if they were only wounded in a battle, they then went home and died a natural death?

Presumably if you were a very unlucky General, and were wounded in 4 or more battles, no-one would want to raise a stuatue anyway.

Russell

[Speling chek] statue [/Speling chek]

Cecil has covered it too:

In statues, does the number of feet the horse has off the ground indicate the fate of the rider?