I think it’s essentially this. The law says that property owners must pay property tax. It’s really hard to argue that you thought something was yours if you weren’t fulfilling your obligations as an owner.
Of course, this isn’t going to settle every dispute - maybe no one paid property tax, or maybe there’s an argument about whether the plat maps on file with the assessor are correct. You can quickly get beyond my knowledge of the law.
what are the laws for a rural renter who has always paid rent…for 12 years…
the land was recently sold to another person.
He has to go to meetings every few months to fight to keep me there, but the city doesn’t want a second home on the property, even though it is extremely far from his home.
Is there any way to stay?
If I understand correctly, I find your situation very weird. I don’t know of any bylaw situation that could say “you no longer have the right to have a building on that property” and require it to be removed, when it was previously legal.
Or is this a case of the locality suddenly deciding to enforce long-standing rules after 12 years?
But then, “the land of the free” has some very weird and authoritarian rules compared to Canada. (For example I have NEVER heard of a bylaw in Canada that forbids unrelated people from sharing a house, something that’s not unusual in some states.)