Careful, that knee jerking is going to cause you to lose a tooth or knock yourself out. This is a perfect example of why you have a fucked-up, warped-beyond-all-sense-of-recognition of what constitutes racism. You’re a fucking idiot.
We’ve already established you have no fucking clue what constitutes racism (or reality). It’s right in the title of this thread, in fact.
I think we can add “done” to the list of words you don’t understand.
If you’d read those threads, you wouldn’t have to Google the term, as it came up all the fucking time.
So you were lying when you said you read them, then. Par for the course with you, I guess.
Using an acronym* that’s already been explained* in threads you said you read shouldn’t need expansion.
Unless you lied about reading them, of course.
Which I’d expect - I knew you were stalking me regardless of the merits of me calling the race realists racists. This just proves it.
Yeah, I’m not the one who thinks “Blacks are subhuman” isn’t racist, I’m so flawed…:rolleyes:
Something you could easily prove with a link to my racism…which you can’t, because you’re a liar.
Like I’ve already explained to your Klanmate: I don’t expect racists like you to have any sense of what is and isn’t racism.
You’re a dumb racist asshole.
Yes, of course they are. What, are you some kind of stupid idiot?
Waitaminute.
:smack:
Belay my last.
Yes, of course they are.
Emphasis added to BG’s post, but that’s it in a nutshell. Not sure how anyone can improve on that.
No, actually we haven’t. Claiming something that’s demonstrably false, as shown by me, in this thread and others, correctly saying what racism is, doesn’t count as establishing it.
No, I changed my mind when I saw that utter fucking idiocy you continued to post.
I’m not remembering every obscure acronym from threads started years ago. It doesn’t appear on the first or last page of the main thread (started before I joined this board) so it’s neither relevant to the OP or to the current debate.
Correct. That you think any statement of fact can be racist shows you don’t actually know what prejudice is. Think about that pre and what it means.
Already done that. Got told off by a moderator for doing so, so I can’t do it again, but I don’t think the link was deleted so anyone who really wants to can find it.
Not that I’d call anyone else who makes such statements racist, of course, unless they had such a bizarre expanded definition of racism as you. But I feel quite comfortable judging you by the standards you judge others. Which is, basically, that you see absolutely fucking everything through a lens of race, and yet call out others for even considering that race exists as a concept.
This thread has shown us that Steophan is a racists and that Smapti is mentally disturbed.
This thread has also shown us that engineers are evil.
I say we leave it there and go out and play.
No, it hasn’t. Please show any post in this thread where I show or advocate prejudice of any sort, whether against race or otherwise.
And more bigotry against the mentally unwell. This thread isn’t going well for those who think they’re the “good guys”. No idea if Smapti is actually ill, but that’s irrelevant.
Seconded.
I’ve skimmed this thread and I think the point that to me is the most obvious has been missed. It’s correct that “Blacks” are subhuman is either true or false." Also, it’s correct that it’s indeed false. Therefore, if someone were to say it was true, that would be a racist statement.
You’ve claimed this before, but have not been able to substantiate it. You’re twisted mind sees racism everywhere. Even where there is none. The prefect example is that you classify Ann Hedonia as a racist for a post that had zero racism. If anything, she was comparing humans to dogs, to illustrate a point. But your fetid mind contorts that to RACISM!
Of course, if you weren’t a weasel-brained hateful scumbag you’d realize that and apologize to Ann Hedonia. But you won’t. You dumb broken fuck.
The act of repeating the statement may well be racist, the statement by itself isn’t.
So words don’t mean anything unless you say them? That is absurd to say the least.
No. As has been pointed out, if you had used the term “non-human”, you’d be right. But “sub-human” has a strong subjective component. It is intrinsic to the term. You cannot claim that it is not there. It is clearly and necessarily racist.
It would serve you well to realize this and modify your original statement.
You may be confusing subhuman with “a subspecies of human”. The latter is a scientific term that can be either true or false. The former is a non-scientific, inherently pejorative term. There is no getting around that unless you are not a native English speaker.
Like Oakland Raider fans right?
Unfortunately, it’s 49ers fans now, too!
They have no effect until uttered, or written, or otherwise presented. The words themselves don’t discriminate, the person using them does. That’s the difference.
How can there be a “statement” without it being uttered or written? Statements don’t exist in the abstract.
In which case, every use of the phrase is racist. That doesn’t change my position that the phrase itself, the actual words, are not inherently racist, because racism is a property of actions and by extension people, not of words.
Using “non-human” would have avoided a sidetrack, but to my knowledge that’s not the historical claim that was used, and not the one referenced in the original thread. It wouldn’t change my argument, though.