and “Could Federal Bailouts have stopped the Great Depression?”
Larry King (that avatar of all investigative virtues) had as his guests the other night John Stossel (the 20/20 correspondent, bestselling author) and Ben Stein (star of WIN BEN STEIN’S MONEY, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, EXPELLED and about 30 Pit Threads). The subject was the wisdom of the government bailouts.
In spite of Stein’s way-over-the-top advocacy of creationism and his TMI columns about his son’s problems I think he is, at his best, an extremely intelligent man (in fact if he was just your average polemicist and religious right shill I don’t think his creationism and other loopy views would be near as frustrating). Though his career has mostly been spent as a show business personality and law professor, Stein is the son of a world famous economist [which in and of itself doesn’t qualify him for anything, but when added to the fact that] he graduated with honors from the Columbia University school of economics, and he’s served on the board of directors of various companies, and he’s been a columnist for Wall Street Journal, Money, Fortune, and other respected business periodicals.
Reason for mentioning this: in spite of his near insanity on some issues, even if you disagree with him on economics issues you at least have to acknowledge his credentials to speak on the topic.
John Stossel was born the lovechild of Ayn Rand and Geraldo Rivera (Geraldo was only 4 at the time, but looked much older and his libido is legendary), has a BA in psychology, and is best known for 20/20. At some point he had a libertarianish conversion and now has a martyrdom complex (as evidenced by the title of his book Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media). Among my many problems with Stossel are such verisimilitudes as “there are more trees in America now than there were a century ago, so how’s the environment in danger?” (roughly like saying “the average income today is higher than it was a century ago, so how’s the economy in danger?”— true, there may be more trees, but they’re not the same kind of trees- the virgin longleaf pine forests that once covered millions of acres is now down to a few thousand, and the ecosystem that evolved in the longleaf forests is completely different and is unable to adjust to the new trees”) or “The richest 1% of people pay 27% of taxes, so rich people are good” (neglected to mention that they make about 27% of the income as well and control far more than that of the wealth). Stossel also received a large six figure settlement from a wrestler who socked him and then decided that big punitive damage awards were evil, and he actually gloats about how he’s a multimillionaire whose beach house was repaired by a government grant that should be done away with.
Anyway, Stossel’s not one of my favorite people and in fact this started out as a pit thread. In fairness, while I don’t recall if I personally have pitted Stein I’ve certainly participated in Stein pitting. In either case I decided a debate over claims made on Larry King would be more interesting than a pitting, so here are the claims (full transcript here):
So the debate:
Of the views above, do you think Stossel or Stein is closer to correct?
Do you think it would be a bigger disaster with or without government handouts?
Do you think Stossel’s Weimar Republic analogy (that too many bailouts will completely debase our currency)?
Do you think Stossel is putting ideology over humans?
Do you believe bailouts would have lessened/worsened/had no effect on The Great Depression?
And any other related question you wish to add or answer.