WAG, IIRC, FAQ, and IANAL could qualify as acronyms. YMMV is pushing it though.
BTW, just what does “SDMB” stand for?
WAG, IIRC, FAQ, and IANAL could qualify as acronyms. YMMV is pushing it though.
BTW, just what does “SDMB” stand for?
Sheesh, how’d I miss this one? Off to ATMB with you.
WAG is an acronym, but I never heard of the other words. In fact I cannot even pronounce the last one. You’re kidding about SDMB, aren’t you?
I infer from context that a “sock puppet” is an alias that a member uses to imply support for their position.
Such as
Keeper0: The sky is not blue. It is green. I saw a show on television about how independent scientists (not those corporate shill Blueists) have taken chromatic measurements to show that it is green.
Kimstu (or any of few thousand brilliant dopers): Do you have a cite for that show?
[sub]Rather than respond to a request for facts, I create a new alias[/sub]
Repeek0: No, he’s not making it up. I saw that show too!
Is this WAG correct?
KEEPER – Yeah, a sock puppet is one poster kissing his own ass, or supporting his own position under a different user name. (More that one user-name = big no-no, BTW.) (BTW = “by the way,” BTW.) Your example is exactly right. It arose (I believe) from the sarcastic comment that a person who would do such a thing (register separately in order to anonymously aggrandize him- or herself) would probably use a sock-puppet for support IRL. (IRL = “in real life,” BTW.)
Now some people have sort of morphed it into the occasional accusation that one poster is being a “sock-puppet” for another – i.e., an unthinking ass-kisser. That use of the term is not accurate, however, because if you’re dealing with two people, not one, then you’re not dealing with a sock-puppet. The prohibition that each person can only have one user-name has pretty much killed off the sock-puppets, thankfully. There were some doozies, back in the day.