Strange statements from officials

Just looked at this article about four persons killed in a home in North Carolina:

Bolding is mine. So, they died of natural causes? Four people were killed while they were all cleaning their guns and they unexpectedly went off? It was a hunting accident?

Just seems to me that four persons killed at one time is pretty much the definition of foul play. Now, had they said, “There is no reason to suspect this was caused by an outsider” I could go with that, since it seems like it might have been a murder/suicide. Still foul, though.

Carbon monoxide poisoning comes to mind as a way four people could die without foul play.

That was my first thought, too, but it does say ‘apparent gunshot deaths’ in the OP.

Yeah, the “apparent gun shot wounds” trigger a foul play reaction in my mind.

Hey, I shoot them up fair and square!

Either there’s a hell of a Darwin Awards story here involving ricochets and “watch this!” or else someone’s operating on auto-pilot and not really thinking about what he’s saying.

Swine Flu + Bad Luck?

I’m not joking.

Doh! :mad: In my defense, I was an idiot, very likely still am.

Just keep on thinkin’, you’ll get there eventually. :wink:

Maybe it’s just a euphemism, meaning that they’re neither ruling it in or out? It gives the impression they’re approching the case purely procedurally, thus reassuring the public, kind of like when the Brits say “…is currently cooperating with authorities”?

Here’s another one. About a week ago, in the first story I saw about that convicted rapist who was arrested after they found six bodies in his home, at the end of the story they said (not an exact quote) “the police are now looking into the possibility that he is a serial killer.”

Gee, do ya think?

Well, there is the possibility he could have killed them all at the same time. Therefore making him a parallel killer.

I think that’s called “spree” killer.

The rapist could also be a grave robber, rather than actually having murdered anyone. Highly unlikely, mind you, but was something to be ruled out.

woosh. geek humor…

Years ago a man was arrested in Washington, DC, foir trespassing onto the White House Lawn armed with a katana.

The police official quoted in the Post said he was charged with “entering White House Grounds with a prohibited weapon.”

Of course that immediately brings to mind the question, with what kinds of weapons ARE you allowed to approach the President?

It was just an odd statement, why not “armed trespassing” or something?

Not officials, but a paraphrase of officials. When the Aldritch Ames case first broke, the headline was “Officials say there might be spies in the CIA”…really? Spies? In the CIA? Alert the media!

So were there extra holes in these people or not?

Doesn’t foul play actually mean murder in this context? - I mean, would a suicide pact be classed as foul play?