Just looked at this article about four persons killed in a home in North Carolina:
Bolding is mine. So, they died of natural causes? Four people were killed while they were all cleaning their guns and they unexpectedly went off? It was a hunting accident?
Just seems to me that four persons killed at one time is pretty much the definition of foul play. Now, had they said, “There is no reason to suspect this was caused by an outsider” I could go with that, since it seems like it might have been a murder/suicide. Still foul, though.
Either there’s a hell of a Darwin Awards story here involving ricochets and “watch this!” or else someone’s operating on auto-pilot and not really thinking about what he’s saying.
Maybe it’s just a euphemism, meaning that they’re neither ruling it in or out? It gives the impression they’re approching the case purely procedurally, thus reassuring the public, kind of like when the Brits say “…is currently cooperating with authorities”?
Here’s another one. About a week ago, in the first story I saw about that convicted rapist who was arrested after they found six bodies in his home, at the end of the story they said (not an exact quote) “the police are now looking into the possibility that he is a serial killer.”
Not officials, but a paraphrase of officials. When the Aldritch Ames case first broke, the headline was “Officials say there might be spies in the CIA”…really? Spies? In the CIA? Alert the media!