Wasn’t sufficiently funny to you or to enough people. I found it hilarious. (And poignant, and often more heart-wrenching than any four network dramas.) It was an odd bird, a half-hour comedy that wasn’t a sitcom, much like The Office. Neither the network nor the public really knew what to do with it.
So do I, but the lesson there is that it’s not enough if a show is hilarious and poignant and heart-wrenching - it also has to be popular. And if it’s on a network as opposed to cable, it has to be damn popular. One of the big ironies of Studio 60 is that while it’s more-or-less about the drama of making Saturday Night Live, a prime-time show that got the audience numbers of Saturday Night Live could easily be considered a dismal failure. I hope it’s a success because I see potential in it, but I’m starting to suspect it might have been better suited to cable with a finite story arc (~two years), more freedom for profanity and adult humour and bigger tolerance for smaller audiences who are already self-selected against network formula. In that setting, Sorkin can be as elitist as he wants.
Just de-lurking for a “Hear Hear!” I can’t watch “What kind of day has it been” (Season 1 finale) without tearing up. or “Kyle Whitaker has two sacks” or … or … or, I’m gonna go watch them again.
Thanks for the “reach around” definitions. Wow. :eek: Leave it to the Dope.
I’m a little bummed that there have been so many references to Bush and Cheney on S4 already. I wouldn’t mind seeing President Matt Santos drop by the set, and do a double-take when he saw that the producer was a dead ringer for his White House chief of staff.
Which gets me thinking… when will Bill Clinton be making an appearance, as himself? Hell, he could be the guest host.
I’m pretty sure that these references were just to show how lazy the writers on the show had been before Matt and Danny got there. Matt was pretty annoyed by all the ideas at the writer’s meeting that had a lot of Bush knocking, and he reacted by coming up with that silly dress policy. I don’t think we’ll be seeing much more of those jokes.
No, she’s saying that she’s unhappy that Studio 60 in set in our real world rather than in the fictional world of The West Wing, and that it would have been fun to have crossovers from that program.
That idea wouldn’t have worked at all, so it’s not surprising they didn’t go for it, but that’s not at all the same as complaining about Bush/Chaney jokes.
It wasn’t very well done with Gillian Anderson in the second season of X-Files, but I really don’t care. I think I’d find it pretty amusing if Peet was obviously pregnant and it just seemed that nobody in Studio 60 noticed.
Sports Night, 4/27/1999: Dana Whitaker (Felicity Huffman): [barges in] You are a sleazy, slimy, adolescent, over-sexed, overpaid blowhole!
Studio 60, 9/25/2006:
Harriet Hayes (Sarah Paulson): [barges in] You are an adolescent, over-sexed, whoremonger with the sensitivity of a head of cabbage.
also:
“…the Kids In The Hall’s Mark McKinney was hired on Studio 60 as a story editor, to oversee the series’ sketch elements. That’s the same McKinney who happened to be an SNL regular in 1995, when David Hyde Pierce performed a musical monologue set to–you guessed it-- The Major-General’s Song.”
McKinney’s not the only one with sketch experience, either: “Jeannie with the light brown hair” is Ayda Field, formerly of the cast of “Blue Collar TV” on the WB. She’s done sketch comedy before, so that should help with the authenticity.