Stuff your faces. Your lives depend on it.

Without debating the actual factual/statistical merits of the claims made in this article and the paper it reflects, would your prognostication have predicted that a somewhat higher than “desirable” BMI would have a lower death rate?

Actually, it occurs to me that I’m not aware of any well-conducted study that generated a BMI vs. lifespan chart, such as you describe, much less capable of addressing arbitrary distinct “groups and subgroups” vs. the general population. I’d estimate that such a study would need a sample size in the high hundreds of thousands (likely millions, to attempt accurate prediction for arbitrary subgroups).

Since I’m not aware of such a large study for BMI vs. lifespan, I’d really appreciate a link or citation for my own education. It’s something I should know.

Or am I being whooshed? You did only say you can make “reasonable predictions” – anyone can make “reasonable” [seeming] predictions. Accurate predictions, as proven by verification, are what most of us would really want. each of those verifications, testing a prediction for a [distinct, non-random] subgroup against a an actual 10K-sample data set) would be a pretty sizable undertaking by itself.

I’m not being picky. I just didn’t know there were such studies, and I feel I should.

This epitomises everything that’s wrong with reporting of health issues in the popular media - whatever the story actually is, it must be summed up in an exaggerated snappy headline, regardless how inaccurately that represents the facts. So some research appears to show that being slightly over the normal weight can result in reduced risks of some health problems, but the media has to report it as “Being fat is good for you” (and that was the BBC).