Finally biting the bullet and getting a PDA. Done quite a bit of research, and have narrowed down the two potential ones I’d purchase. But at a roadblock - can’t decide if ultimately Pocket PC (Windows) or Palm (Palm OS) is a better bet.
As mentioned in title, the two I’m looking at are the HP iPaq 4150/4155 or the Palm Tungsten 3
What I’m curious about are people’s opinions on PPC vs Palm in general, or actual experience with either of these two machines.
My immediate needs are the basic calendaring and contacts, but I foresee using the PDA for more things down the road (carrying around Excel docs). I also would really like WiFi.
The Tungsten 3 has an awesome screen - expandable and with landscape view option. Palm in general has a ton more software add-ons. Apparently Documents to Go actually handles Excel/Word/etc better than Microsoft’s own Pocket editions of the same. However, the T3 has a very poor battery. Furthermore, no WiFi, and no external adapters for such available either.
The iPaq is a sweet little machine, although the screen isn’t anywhere near the T3’s (that being said, the fact that Pocket PCs support ClearType means they are easier to read for some people). It does have WiFi built in. Battery is ok. I like the fact that Pocket PC’s can multitask. Have heard reports that the Outlook conduit for iPaqs drop info occasionally.
So that’s it. I’m stuck. Looking for anything to tip the balance.