Stupid Gun news of the day (Part 1)

It could be, if you have some way of knowing with absolute certainty that all they want is “your stuff.”

Natch. It’s lose-lose, ain’t it.

If only there were studies that could tell us which side loses more, houses with guns or houses without guns…

Going by what he said, he was able to do use a bolt lock if he wanted to. Maybe there’s more to it, but that’s what he said.

What if they came down the chimney? But they didn’t. They used the path of least resistance. That’s what this about, not hypotheticals.

Whatever he meant, he didn’t do it and instead got a gun that didn’t make his door any more secure than it was the first four times he was broken into.

The answer is in my quote that you used. That’s why going down this road will just be tedious. Whatever I post won’t mean anything to you.

If only it were about the odds rather than the stakes…

(Added bolding mine)

What answer? I ask in all seriousness. All I can see that you said is essentially “because they’re the police”. I asked how does that make the situation qualitatively different, and I still don’t have an answer beyond “read my post”. Tell you what, Scumpup, please tell me if you see an answer to my question, because I don’t.

He seems to consider “the police have more authority” to be a sufficient answer. YMMV. Mine certainly does.

The police use magic bullets that don’t penetrate sheetrock or paneling. Duh.

There’s your answer, Lumpy.

The average NYC cop get less range time in a year than I do in a month. I think they have to fire something like 50 rounds a year and hit a man sized target 37 times from 7 yards away. Seriously, I could teach you to shoot that well in a weekend.

Spikes has had engraved lower receivers for a long time. Everything from comic book characters to military unit emblems to bible verses.

This bigotry is new.

They make mostly AR-15s and had a good reputation for making good quality guns for a very reasonable price. They have been losing that reputation as their prices have crept up and their quality has crept down. I suspect this is a marketing gimmick but maybe they ARE that stupid.

It really looks like intermediate scrutiny is the way things seem to be going.

The anti-registration people won’t like it, but on the face of it, it doesn’t actually infringe on keeping and bearing arms. I could live with it.

Here’s a good one: man injured in car jacking. Two men took this poor guys truck at a gas station. A witness to the crime pulled out his gun and started shooting. Missed the criminals, but shot the car jacking victim in the head. He then picked up all the bullet casings and fled the scene.

That must be the well-trained militia the founding fathers had in mind, the rugged upstanding patriot who takes responsibility for himself.

Of course. Can’t be littering - that would be wrong.

Maybe he was an off-duty cop.

Thank god for good guys with guns.