And it’s something that is widely used in many other areas, for very good reason. But guns are holy and exempt from conventional reality.
You were asked what you would propose. You have nothing. But you don’t have the integrity to admit it. All you can do is deflect.
You now say it’s facetious, but it’s the first thing you could think of. Now think about it some more: Who is at risk from your balls and your own imperfect ability to control them? We already know about **Scumpup **and toddlers, so maybe there’s a point there, but I don’t think even you would claim it’s “logically equivalent”.
**Damuri **also once again has no answer to a serious issue about saving lives other than to deride the question and questioner. He too has demonstrated a basic incapability of understanding the most basic principle of society - Thou Shalt Not Kill.
One cannot reach the mentally ill, such as any of you, by pure reason, no, but it’s still necessary to get you to realize that you are ill.
My proposal is one you’ve repeatedly rejected out of hand: more people being armed for self-defense
No one- exactly like my gun. But like a radical lesbian who denounces all men as rape monsters, you refuse to believe in gun owners’ restraint and judgment.
[/quote]
Very true; but when someone else breaks that principle and the choice is either I die or they die, I prefer for charity to begin at home.
I would scoff at your hyperbole, but unfortunately there actually are people so “progressive” that they would ideologically redefine the conservative mindset as mental illness, like was done in the Soviet Union.
So the Zimmerman gun auction has been moved to another site, but apparently the number of people trying to reach it has crashed their site. Unless it was an attack.
And the second site appears to be unreachable now. Zimmerman’s gun will probably be endlessly stalked by DDoS attacks as soon as the hosting site is announced.
Daily Mail gives this url for the second [del]sight[/del] site. So far, I have not been able to get it to load. At first it timed out after showing close to loading (magazine almost in), but lately it quits almost immediately (no progress bar or a flicker of one).
Now tell us how that would save the guy in the bathroom. :rolleyes:
And that’s exactly what many gun owners get proven wrong about, every day. You’re just different, huh?
This thread is full of counterexamples, isn’t it?
So you say I need to shoot you first, is that it?
It isn’t hyperbole, but well-demonstrated fact.
Your fantasizing about killing cops is not “the conservative mindset”. Your willingness to let people get killed as long as they are not you is not “the conservative mindset”. Your demonstrated absolute inability to understand and respect the value of human life isn’t either. It’s psychopathy.
He’s a bit extreme and (like everyone) wrong from time to time) but he’s not so stupid that folks on his side of the debate routinely disown him. Elvis OTOH seems incapable of original thought and doesn’t even seem to really understand the argument he parrots from other websites but when in doubt just repeats them with more vigor.
Well, prior restraint only refers to the first amendment but much of the caselaw surrounding the second amendment is borrowing concepts from the first amendment.
However it is very clear that some prior restraint is permissible (e.g. prohibition on felons having guns). So while I think prior restraint is permissible, the government needs a pretty good reason IMHO.