Stupid Gun news of the day (Part 1)

Does this count as “stupid gun news” or is Bone gonna post it in his thread?

But what about the person at fault?

It’s Positive because the more people who carry guns in public, the safer we all are.

“Proud sellout” is somewhere between “dehydrated frog” and “human corpse turned into a life-sized hand-puppet to torment its onetime family in life” as far as things to be.

FTR, Putnam is the leading candidate for the GOP gubernatorial nomination, and has described himself as “a proud NRA sellout”. Big Sugar actually owns a controlling interest in him, with the NRA being a junior partner.

But expect him to get questioned on this almost like Hillary getting questioned on her e-mails.

And the higher our chances of being involved in a “Tactical Situation” where we can all act out our fantasies and just feel alive.

But it is negative because the unqualified and untrained employee that was allowing those who were ineligible to purchase a gun to pass a background check was fired, and now criminals and domestic abusers will have a harder time arming themselves, meaning fewer guns and less safety.

[/:rolleyes:]

Is it just me, or do these guys really like passing the buck down to their employees. Sure, she did wrong, but she did wrong under the direction and supervision of those whose job it was to direct and supervise her to do it right.

Sounds like she wasn’t deceitful, and the negligence was on the part of the person who assigned her the job.

Update:

FBI agent who accidentally shot a man after back flip in Denver club is charged with assault

I always thought assault required intent and that this would have been processed as reckless endangerment or something along that vein. But I suppose the DA knows what he’s doing.

Another gun nut to embarassed to admit that he was masturbating with his gun when it went off.

Masturbating with a gun gives new meaning to “gun nut”.

What, exactly, went off?

“Lower leg”, huh?

If not his leg, what else was he using as a backstop?

Seems firing at something on a telephone pole is the perfect angle to get a nice ballistic trajectory that carries on with lethal velocity for a good long while.

There is also quite a bit of expensive equipment on and around the telephone pole that the cable, phone, and electric companies would probably rather not have destroyed.

There is also the overall legality. You do need a license to hunt raccoons legally, unless they are in your house.

… he was attempting to shoot a raccoon on a telephone pole …” could be read in one of two ways. For it to make sense, he was up on the telephone pole and the trash panda was coming up after him.

That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.

Also, probably exactly what happened.

That’s where the stand-your-ground laws come in?

He wouldn’t have been the first person to make the mistake of shooting at a racoon that is sitting at the top of a wooden pole. Rocket Racoon - Oh Yeah - YouTube

Climbing up a power pole, being chased by a furry bandit, sounds a lot like not standing your ground.

Oh, *he *climbed the pole? I assumed it was the bandit-faced rat. They’re much better at it.

Okay, we have a Non-Defensive (because failed and cowardly) Gun Use, with 1 injury (to the shooter himself, nearly a member of the Darwin Awards site). Thank Og for the Second Amendment!

That was my inference. He shot himself in the leg while trying to shoot a raccoon on the pole. Do the math (or assume that there is some kind of flaw in his story).