Stupid Gun news of the day (Part 1)

Follow up to my own question:

After 4 months in jail under a 2 million dollar bond, he pled guilty to 70 felony gun charges and was sentenced to 51 years probation. I think he gets out today.

She is out on an ankle bracelet and has her court date later this month.

They were manufacturing, modifying, and selling unregistered assualt weapons out of their home under the cover of their fake “tactical supply” business which presented itself as selling only gun and shooting accessories.

They did not have a federal firearms dealers license. There were multiple weapons in their home. Some belonged to the couple and others were accompanied with the name of the owners and what mods were being done on the particular weapon.

The couple was also making “suggestive comments” about their modification activity a bit on FB- comments about machinery, measurements, etc., but it was pretty easy to read between the lines and see what they were really offering once I understood what it was they were doing.

They also made odd comments on FB about stuff like how, since you can’t shoot down a drone, you have to know the drone operator (suggesting to shoot the drone operator, and not the drone), and how to dig trenches that would keep LEO’s from being able to raid your compund easily.

It wasn’t just “memes” as the couple claimed. He closed his FB account after the second but before the third arrest. She continued to post for a while but deleted anything ‘questionable’. Her account has been inactive since just before thier third arrest and I presume that she is not allowed to use social media as a condition of her release.

They seemed to think that if he had the machinery and know-how, she conducted the sales, and a third party provided the weapon to be modified from semi-auto to full-auto, that somehow none of them individually was guilty of a crime.

For the next 51 years, he:
cannot own a gun or any part of a gun,
cannot own pepperspray,
cannot travel out of county for more than 48 hours without notifying his PO, travel more than 50 miles without notifying his PO,
cannot use drugs or alcohol (probably due to previous DUI/DWI charges),
must take regular and also random drug screens,
and must allow a search of his home or property at any time with or without notice,
must submit regular financial statements.

He also cannot own or operate a computer or use social media. He can have a cellphone but cannot use it to access the internet or use any software or programs intended to hide communication.

He can’t even own a mean dog if it would prevent LE from searching his home, car, or work.

Overall, he now has about 50 restrictions to his life for the next 51 years.
He does have permission to use an assumed name in the course of opening a business.

I wonder if he can resist the temptation to reopen his fake tactical supply business?

NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch says the only thing that could stop a good guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun:

Yeah right, black immigrant kills white cop, who ya gonna believe?

He thought it was a spirit AND he thought he could shoot it?

Did we do this one already?? Here’s a good guy with a gun.

I have a great idea for concerned parents: Home Schooling.

An excellent point.
The Black guy who broke up a robbery and saved people from being shot took the gun away from the bad guy and threw it behind a counter, for he knew when the cops showed up they would shoot him on sight if he were holding a gun.

Wait, wait, the NRA is advocating shooting policewomen? :dubious:

Armed drivers engage in road rage shoot out, one passenger dead.

I guess J.G. was “standing his ground” ?

When an innocent black person without a gun gets shot, it’s because they didn’t have a gun. When an innocent black person with a gun gets shot, it’s because they had a gun.

Also: When an innocent black person without a gun gets shot, it’s because they had a gun.

CMC fnord!

People need to learn to secure their guns if they are thinking that their gun is going to help protect their family.

Didn’t see anyone post this one either, be careful when you are driving through the woods, as you may end up with your kid shot in the head.

Isn’t one of the rules of gun safety to know your backstop, to know what is behind what you are shooting at?

Not only are they not being charged with anything, it doesn’t even appear as though their ability to continue to possess guns is in any jeopardy, even though they have demonstrated their inability to use them responsibly.

Yes. Not having read the story, I’d consider their conduct negligent, and possibly reckless from what you’ve described. Both should lead to criminal charges. Very disappointing that it seems that isn’t going to happen.

“Sorry,” shouldn’t be acceptable when you screw up using a firearm.

No, that is not one of the rules of gun safety. About 35 years ago in Boy Scouts, I did some .22 target shooting as part of the program. That is how long ago I handled a loaded firearm. Yet, I could go over to the local sporting goods store and buy a gun and a rack of rounds, no questions asked. Yes, I might have to pass a BG check, but that just makes sure my record is clean.

I might be a TFM, an undiagnosed psychopath or a fuming ex-lover, but those things are not covered. As long as my history is clean, off I go with my new toy.

Which is to say: there are no fucking rules. There is no such thing as “gun safety” as long as we let any old ignorant moron load up no questions asked.

That sounds like the Trailer Park Boys method of “legally” stealing patio furniture and BBQ grills. One guy takes the stuff from the yard and puts it at the end of the driveway, and that’s not stealing. The other guy loads it up for transport because it was fair game at that pint, and so not stealing.

Yep, stupid…

4 dead, 1 injured after shooting at toddler’s party in Texas

All it takes to stop a good guy with a gun, is a cop with a gun.

Without peeking, guess Roberson’s race.

“It’s duck season!”

“Wabbit season!”

“Deer season!”

"Old lady season!"

Alabama boy, 2, dies after shooting himself, family says

Why are we spending so much money fighting terrorists when clearly the scourge of America is toddlers with guns?

Our delightful NRA has filed suit against the State of Washington over a new law that puts heavy restrictions on the sale of semi-automatics, raising the purchase age to 21, requiring stiffer background checks and prohibiting sales to non-residents (this law could go into the Positive Gun News thread, but I would rather not be accused of threadshitting). The law was introduced as an initiative that passed with 60% yes.

I would say this action unambiguously paints the NRA as an obvious industry shill.

I assume that if it wins out, Bone will happily put it in positive news, as he usually puts anything that expands the availability of guns as a positive.