This is exactly what I’m talking about when I complain that the “good guys vs. bad guys” dichotomy is overly simplistic when applied to gun rights arguments, and doesn’t reflect the complex reality. Clearly, this was a good man defending himself against a bad thigh.
I’ve never had a Pizza Guy or Mormon break down my front door.
One must be in fear of one’s life inside one’s home.
Flyer delivery, now that is another matter.
What’s to stop an armed thug from disguising himself as a pizza guy or Mormon? I mean it’s a terrifying and scary world out there - just turn the TV on and you’ll see what I mean. It’s absolutely terrifying. Paralysing fear. Gut-wrenching, pants filling fear.
So really, it’s logical to shoot first, ask questions later. God will sort them out.
But not the court.
No, she should have been disarmed! Or how about this stupid gun owner? She had called 911, shouldn’t she have just waited for the police to rescue her?
She should have given the baby the hand gun. It was way to small to handle the 12 gauge.
Man shot dead after pulling into wrong driveway
Now, make no mistake, this guy is going away for a long, long time. But the problem is, the perception by many gun owners is that they are justified any time they are in fear of attack. They will be prosecuted after the fact, but that won’t bring back their innocent victims.
Hey, let’s all make fun of this 72 year old man who thinks he can pay hero with his concealed pistol!
I hope not. I believe you are correct in that case, however.
Perhaps there should be a license to own firearms involving a test about this sort of thing and an annual background check..
That would close the so called “gun show loophole” and make owners aware of the legislation concerning shooting at someone.
I can shoot an intruder in my house if I am in fear of my life, but I can’t (nor would I want to) chase him out into the street and shoot him.
Wow! Once upon a time, a gun worked the way it does on TV and killed the bad guy. Tell us another one, Uncle Kable!
Pretty cool huh! Here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcLo_TGy7pA&list=PLSw0sjngejk4zIZTU40pH-4MyqCdd0I_H
Let me know if you want another!
Oh, sure, you liberals are all about the Wal-Mart worker, until one is getting stabbed, then you don’t care unless the stabber gets shot by an illegal alien on Medicare!
It depends if the price of WalMart socks goes up.
No doubt he’s overweight and is chipping away at his excess fat one scoop at a time.

No, she should have been disarmed! Or how about this stupid gun owner? She had called 911, shouldn’t she have just waited for the police to rescue her?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NJQK2BscIg&list=PLSw0sjngejk4zIZTU40pH-4MyqCdd0I_H&feature=mh_lolz
Are you just trying to prove that you’re the dumbest gun rights proponent on the intarwebz?
Your linked story isn’t about a gun owner at all. And you keep posting strawmen like you live in a hayfield.
How do you find your mouth with the food? I mean, your posts are giving the impression that you’re a fucking idiot. Do you even understand why you look like an idiot?

This is exactly what I’m talking about when I complain that the “good guys vs. bad guys” dichotomy is overly simplistic when applied to gun rights arguments, and doesn’t reflect the complex reality. Clearly, this was a good man defending himself against a bad thigh.
That’s hardly fair. His leg wasn’t even armed.

That’s hardly fair. His leg wasn’t even armed.
Yeah, but there’s a right to bear arms, not bear legs; so it’s just tough luck for any legs that get uppity.
Military hero, elite navy Seal, author of “American Sniper”, shot and killed at gun range: http://www.wfaa.com/news/crime/rough-creek-189536271.html

Military hero, elite navy Seal, author of “American Sniper”, shot and killed at gun range: http://www.wfaa.com/news/crime/rough-creek-189536271.html
Probably have to demote him to second deadliest U.S. sniper.

Probably have to demote him to second deadliest U.S. sniper.
That’s hilarious! Imagine how funny it would have been if this girl didn’t have a gun.