Stupid Privileged White Kid Gets 6 Months for Rape, Father describes it as "20 minutes of action"

Right on.

Maybe conservatives can manage to learn to read. I didn’t say anything about getting rid of the first amendment or modifying state penal codes. I said what I would do if it were up to me, not whati would modify the legal system to do. There’s a big difference between the two, and I doubt I’ll going to be appointed dictator any time soon

Of course what Brock Turner’s father said was very offensive. But many people say many offensive things. I guess I was wrong to come into the hornet’s nest to talk about these issues.

You’re clearly NOT here to talk about the issues, you’re here to try and score cheap partisan political points, you lying piece of shit.

Go back to complaining about mommy and daddy paying for your school and how useless you are at life.

A poignant observation.
And horrible to think that the system betrays and doubly victimizes those who do not have such a strong voice.

Hell’s bells! Even the articulate and powerful plea by this remarcable woman was ignored.

Thank you. This is comforting to know.
I’d love to sign this petition, but I don’t suppose it’s open to non-citizens/non-residents of the US?
(I’ve never used Change.org, so I don’t know how it works, but will be happy to sign if I can.)

You do not know anything about me. Your mother and her father are canine feces.

About time you posted in the pit you stupid asshole troll.

Women who play the drums, I know of an indie band slot opening up real soon now…

I only answer in kind when attacked first.

Some more information on why Persky sentenced as he did.

[QUOTE=The Guardian]
“There is less moral culpability attached to the defendant who is … intoxicated,” the judge said.
[/QUOTE]

Good to know if I ever want to commit a crime.

[QUOTE=The Guardian]
Persky also noted that news coverage of the case had significantly impacted Turner, saying: “The media attention that has been given to this case has in a way sort of poisoned the lives of the people that have been affected. … The question I’ve asked myself is … ‘Is state prison for this defendant an antidote to that poison?’”
[/QUOTE]

Why is it the legal system’s responsibility to provide an antidote? The defendant came by his poisonous media attention honestly.

[QUOTE=The Guardian]
“I take him at his word that subjectively that’s his version of his events. … I’m not convinced that his lack of complete acquiescence to the verdict should count against him,” he said.
[/QUOTE]

If someone is convicted of three felonies by a jury of his peers, I would think in order to be certain that the felon won’t re-offend, he ought to understand what he did wrong. The judge is acknowledging that the defendant doesn’t, but claims that shouldn’t be a concern. Why not?

Second, how the hell is the defendent’s subjective view relevant? Maybe Defendant Number 2 sincerely believed Granny had it coming to her when he pushed her down the stairs. Should we be lenient on him also?

[QUOTE=The Guardian]
Persky also appeared to rely heavily on letters that Turner’s friends and family sent and read an excerpt from a former classmate who told the judge she couldn’t believe the assault allegations.

“To me that just rings true,” the judge said. “It sort of corroborates the evidence of his character up until the night of this incident, which has been positive.”
[/QUOTE]

So despite the evidence of that evening, which proved to a jury’s satisfaction that the defendant committed three violent felonies, the judge believed he’s really a nice guy after all. After all, his friend said so.

This is disgusting.

But he’s a really good swimmer! It’s so weird and irrelevant. I find it interesting that the defense attorney stressed the fact that he remembered the events, but she didn’t. So…a person can be sober enough to remember events, but in the same moment, be too drunk to know right from wrong?

Okay, let him face Trial By Shark.

The rapist looks like Wee Dingwall.

Thank you, signed.

I’m going to frame this very carefully, as I am absolutely of no different opinion about the two shitbags and one privilege-coddler in this narrative. But… I think the rage has been slightly off-target in one respect.

It’s an absolutely terrible choice of phrase, but I don’t read the father’s letter as “20 minutes of action” meaning “twenty minutes of gettin’ it on, yo!” It seems clear to me that he meant “20 minutes of my son’s actions in 20 years of life.”

Changes nothing. I agree with nearly every post above, and maybe a grammar cop isn’t needed in this mob. But misinterpreting subtle points in events and working up extra, misguided rage about them bothers me. There’s more than enough here for justified rage.

Yep. They deserve a lot more recognition. Apparently they are two Swedish PhD students.

Untrue. You came into this thread completely unbidden and started attacking someone. You then attacked all liberals on a liberal messageboard.

I give you a pass for not knowing that the guy was using hyperbole and does not actually want the guy arrested. But you didn’t just say you disagreed. You took it further and attacked people.

And this is the Pit. If you attack people, you are going to get attacked back.

You really need to work on your Pit material. :stuck_out_tongue: you sound like a bot. You are a bot. Fuckin cyborgs. Lame.

You’re like a Trump Borg.

Just a heads-up to folks that that Facebook page is gone (or at least temporarily unviewable).

Seems likely to me that the rest of the band went “WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SAYING AND WHY ARE YOU SAYING IT ON THE BAND PAGE???” and took it all down.