“Context”. You may want to look that up, it’s rather important.
As for the rest of your post, well, what to say. It’s sad enough that you find trying to provoke a response amusing, but to be so banal in your attempt to shock really is rather pitiful. At least try to be creative in your trolling.
Tedious troll is tedious. News at… Never.
Maybe the reporter went to Berkeley.
Rape only has one cause. That’s either actually beyond your understanding (incel? MRA?) or you’re just getting a real giggle from this.
Has someone put this twerp in the Troll thread yet?
I mean, I reported it. But, y’know, bringing up that the red pill ideology is awful is worth a warning; pointing out that women who get drunk at frat parties deserve to be raped is just fine.
Fifteen days pay goes to your bank account if you can prove I pointed that out.
…how about you just donate the 15 days pay to Rape Crisis (or similar charity) without anyone pointing anything out. Be a good citizen of the world. Do the right thing.
Okay, wise ass, you win: You want to make the same challenge in response to a reworded version that changes the meaning only by an amount indiscernable to the naked eye?
There’s little risk to you regardless. As if anybody would give their bank account information to the likes of you…
No bets since you somewhat got my drift (funny since i’m supposed to be the one with bad grammar.) No, make that “wholly accurate.”
So it’s just fine, right? A man can drop a scintilla of cynicism regarding women who get drunk during frat parties. It’s just fine since I’m not discussing law. The law says rape is rape. I’m just mystified as to why western civilization refuses to consider security and crime deterrence with regard to rape, when it does for nearly all other crimes.
“women who get drunk at frat parties deserve to be raped”
deserve* verb [T not continuous]
uk /dɪˈzɜːv/ us /dɪˈzɝːv/
"to have earned or to be given something because of the way you have behaved"
Cue tedious sophistry from Sloe claiming that despite saying she was at fault and should be blamed for the rape, he wasn’t actually saying that it transpired because of the way she behaved (or something equally mendacious).
HEY MODS IS THIS OKAY
Seriously what the fucking fuck
Maybe it’s because the law doesn’t think that because a woman, for whatever reason, is incapable of preventing someone from physically abusing them she should be partially blamed for it.
You’ve already made it clear you think that a woman who’s too drunk to stop someone raping her is guilty. How about the elderly or frail? People who haven’t done martial arts maybe? Women who dress too provocatively? In your eyes just what actions do you also see as condoning raping them bitches? After all, in the above cases all of them have left themselves without appropriate security and deterrence, so clearly they’re fair game by your “reasoning”.
When men get drunk they can anticipate a hangover.
But when a women gets drunk, they should anticipate a possible rape?
Yeah, that seems totally fair! If a gay man rapes you next time you’re drunk, is that your fault? Or his?
I know. I am allowed to rob a passed out drunk guy or kick him in the head but I can’t rape him? What kind of crazy world is this?
All women, and possibly most small animals, should not drink in the presence of Sloe Moe.
Who doesn’t need $89?
I think you’re being too generous.
How does this reduce Brock Turner’s guilt?
If I leave my keys in my car, and the car is stolen, I absolutely acted in a stupid way that led to my car being stolen.
The car thief is still one hundred percent guilty.
He pulled a lot of overtime.
It ain’t overtime he’s [del]yanking[/del] pulling.