A bit lame for the Pit, but here goes anyway…
There was a big power blackout in parts of Sweden last week. I was in one of the computer rooms at the University of Lund at the time, working on an assignment. Screens black out. We go outside, trying to reach our teacher to work out what to do now. One female student, approximately 40 years of age, has an idea.
“If we all just believe that the power will come back, I’m sure it will”, she says.
I gently opine that I don’t think it will work.
“Yes, it will”, she says. “After all, that’s how airplanes fly.”
My interest piqued, I eloquently say “Huh?”.
“They can fly because all the passengers really believe they can”, she says. “Otherwise, how could these big, heavy things fly?”
“The Bernoulli Principle”, I reply as dead-pan as I can.
“The what?”
“Bernoulli Principle.”
“What’s that?”
“Well, the wing is shaped like this (descriptive hand gestures). The air above the wing travels faster than the air below the wing, which, according to the Bernoulli Principle, means the pressure of the air below the wing is higher than the pressure of the air above the wing. This creates an upward force that keeps the plane in the air.”
She contemplates this.
“So that’s how a plane flies?”, she says.
“Yep”, I answer. “It only works if the wing is moving forward really fast, which is why they have to drive the plane so fast on the ground when they take off.”
“And this is called?”
“The Bernoulli Principle. B-E-R-N-O-U-L-L-I.”
“Oh. I thought it was the faith of the passengers.”
“Well then you learnt something today, didn’t you?”
Now, is this woman stupid or just ignorant? On the one hand, she was eager to learn, which points to mere ignorance, soon eradicated. On the other hand, how can you possibly go through life believing that the commonly accepted explanation for airplane flight is the faith of the passengers? How did the first airplane fly then?
[sub]And yes I know my explanation of flight was simplified. You go in depth with someone like that when you’re already annoyed for a thousand different reasons. And besides, that’s not the point.[/sub]