[QUOTE=Polycarp]
Arthur C. Clarke, of course, did actually promulgate three laws – though the first two are obverse and reverse of the same broad concept.
I. If a distinguished elderly scientist states without equivocation that something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
II. If a distinguished elderly scientist states without equivocation that something is impossible, he is almost certainly wrong.
III. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
[/QUOTE]
Ah, my esteemed fellow correspondent – but you inadvertently skipped the actual Second Clarke Law while splitting the first. Which everybody does because it is not as oratorical as than the first and not as pithy as the thrird. The recently-departed gent’s actual set were:
- When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
*2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible. *
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
He also added a corollary of the first: “For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert”