Sudden Oak Death Fungus: Looming Environmental (and Landscaping) Disaster?

Maple, specifically, Sugar Maple, would actually be a very good candidate to replace Oak trees. Just like Oaks, they’re also hardwood, slow growing, and make up a substantial portion of American forests. Maples seem to have a reputation of all being fast-growing weeds that have soft wood that falls on everything. This is pretty much only true for Silver Maples. Oaks seem to have a reputation of all being slow-growing trees that aren’t worth planting because (i) they will grow too slowly and the original planter won’t live long enough or own the house long enough to see it reach a substantial height, and (ii) they will grow too large to fit in the yard. This is pretty much only true for trees in the White Oak group (White, Bur), but not true for trees in the Black Oak group (Black, Northern Red, Pin, Scarlet). When it comes to rates of growth, Sugar Maple is actually slower than Northern Red Oak. However, I still advocate growing White Oaks, since trees should not always be planted for oneself.

As for resistance, it is my understanding, based on the FAQ of the Sudden Oak Death site, that “leaf blight”, but not death, comes to the species other than Oaks that the fungus infects. So Maples (which are on the list of affected species), and perhaps the Tulip Poplars that you mentioned, would, to my understanding, be carriers for the fungus, but not affected by it greatly.

I share your concern, and I’m sure many other Dopers do as well. We have a Northern Red Oak, our neighbor across the street has a Scarlet Oak, and two other neighbors within three houses of us have Northern Red Oaks. In fact, the name of our town is “Oakwood” for God sakes. I’m also growing Oak saplings for myself and a couple of relatives, to be used as shade trees for our houses, and am wondering whether to cut and run on those, and maybe switch to Maples or something.

What about Ginkgo trees? I live in Ohio, and they originated in Asia. They are 150 million years old (as evidenced by fossil record) and were once thought to be extinct, until a few hundred years ago, when explorers found Asians growing them in a monestary. Since then, they have been brought to America and are a popular street tree. They adapt well to city conditions and have no known insects, pests, or parasites that disease them. In fact, I’d advocate planting them, just by the shear fact that they’ve withstood the test of time, and would worry a lot less about a Dutch Ginkgo (Elm) disease or Sudden Ginkgo (Oak) death happening to them.

That’s an interesting thought. If I were landscaping a house right now, I’d have to think twice about oak trees, at least until we see how this fungus plays out in the East. (And I still don’t see any conclusive evidence as to whether the fungus will be as devastating to Eastern oaks as it has been to those in the West. We can keep our fingers crossed, I guess.)

I recently planted a couple of tulip poplar seedlings. They are fast-growing, with relatively soft wood. The soft wood’s a drawback, I suppose, but on the plus side, these trees do ultimately reach the towering, mammoth size of the big oaks. (They don’t spread as much, but you can force them to spread more by topping them.)

Still wondering whether hickories and the other nut trees are vulnerable. If not, I think hickories will ultimately dominate because hickory nuts will be replacement food for squirrels (in the absence of acorns). Squirrels will “plant” hickory trees by burying the nuts, as they do now with acorns.

Both maples and tulip poplars sprout like weeds, so I’m sure both of these species would also fill in any spaces vacated by oaks.

Well, tulip trees were called by Walt Whitman the “Apollos of the Forest”. Here in the East, they’re the second tallest tree, the first being sycamores, if I’m not mistaken. Interestingly, they’re related to magnolias.
The only species that could make up to wildlife what oaks mean in terms of nutrition is the honey locust, which isn’t even really native to areas east of the Appalachians, at least. I did rent a house that had these trees in the yard next door, though, and these trees did attract hordes of squirrels and woodpeckers. Problem with this tree is that the wild form has very large thorns that grow even on the trunk.

Before we panic too much, it should be noted that here in the US at least, it doesn’t occur except in coastal areas of the West, because the fungus grows in cool, wet areas. As even here in northern NJ we have very hot, dry summers, I don’t think most people (Oakwood, Ohio, take note) have to worry too much. Just make sure to keep the rhododendrons, mountain laurel, camellias, and pieris japonica a reasonable distance away from your oaks, just in case.
OTOH, if you’re European, panic.
Map on this page, scroll down some: http://nature.berkeley.edu/comtf/html/about_sudden_oak_death.html

ED: What about Ginkgo trees? […] They adapt well to city conditions and have no known insects, pests, or parasites that disease them. In fact, I’d advocate planting them, just by the shear fact that they’ve withstood the test of time, and would worry a lot less about a Dutch Ginkgo (Elm) disease or Sudden Ginkgo (Oak) death happening to them.

Sure, as pantom says, I’m no purist; I’m not advocating some castaway-like system of “genetic freedom” for trees where no furriners are allowed to move into the neighborhood. :smiley: I’m just pointing out that when you use plants that grow locally (including originally alien species such as gingko that have been growing locally for decades or centuries), you substantially reduce the chances of spreading exotic destructive nasties.

Many commercial nurseries, on the other hand, are the vegetable equivalent of bareback bathhouses: facilitation centers for distributing pests and diseases from all over the freaking world. One aspect of practicing safe landscaping is not being so promiscuously welcoming towards every cute species that happens to catch your fancy. (Hmm, I think I’m gonna regret this metaphor.)