A contention which you will now back up with numerous facts…
Then I take back what I said above. Obama’s greatest weakness is his failure to live up to his ideological beliefs. Look at him - he’s been in office for four years and he’s done nothing to advance socialism in that time.
Who cares what Sununu has to say? He’s a washed-up has-been, a charisma-challenged, jowly-face moron who knows he will only get attention if he makes such repulsive statements as he just did about Obama. So I ask again, who cares what he thinks?
Because unless I’ve been horribly mistaken all this time, he’s an official representative of a major Presidential candidate?
John Sununu? GHWB’s one-time Chief of Staff?
When I read the thread title, I figured this was a zombie from 2004.
That’s a very generous thing for you to say about President Obama.
I’d like to say the same thing about you.
Yeah…That’s why the central pillar of his health care overhaul is an idea from Heritage Foundation from about 20 years ago. Those damn socialists!
I think what you are suffering from is a problem known as “projection”. (Look it up.) Conservatives have gone so far down the road of elevating ideology over science, fact, and evidence that they have trouble understanding those who don’t.
I can’t stand Obama but he’s definitely not lazy. You can’t be lazy and run for President, willingly going through month after month of sleep deprivation, handlers, watching every damn word you say and kissing babies in 50 states.
He’s also not stupid. He managed to get himself elected President out of nowhere on no record and still has half the country eating out of the palm of his hand after 4 years of more failure than success. And he’s been married 20 years to the same woman and they appear to actually have a real marriage and still love each other.
He did *something *smart along the way.
At least Sununu didn’t call Obama “uppity”.
Yet.
“The President likes loose shoes, tight pussy and a warm place to shit.”
Interesting how quickly you guys are to assert racism.
It’s not as interesting how quickly your guys are to spew it and then deny it.
Yeah, it’s just a coincidence, when Newt Gingrich speculates that Obama has rhythm, needs a lot of sleep, and likes to play basketball.
Interesting how hard you pretend it’s not there.
Didn’t Will just point this out as some sort of fear of firing a black guy?
He’s about as much a socialist as you are, more’s the pity.
I don’t know. I haven’t read the George Will column people are referring to.
But I think race could be an unexpected issue in this election. I think there may have been some voters who voted for Obama in 2008 in order to prove that they weren’t prejudiced and that America could elect a black president.
But in 2012, it’s going to be “been there done that”. Having proven we can elect a black president, there’s no milestone involved in re-electing a black president.
I don’t necessarily agree there’s racism afoot. (Surprise, surprise, eh?)
It’s obviously absurd to say Obama is either “not bright” or lazy. I may have a bias towards the study of law, but I think any fair-minded person understands that you cannot attend a top tier law school, and make Law Review, and be anything other than very bright. Similarly, you can’t be lazy and win the Presidency, at least not in the modern era. If you could, Fred Thompson would have made it to the White House.
But I think it is possible to describe someone as lazy and not mean to describe their general disposition, but rather a specific time. My wife may hint darkly at my laziness, but she doesn’t think I’m a lazy person as a rule… just that there’s mulch in bags to be spread but also football on TV, and I’m making the wrong choice.
In other words, if Obama chose not to prep hard for this debate, someone might say that was “lazy” without meaning Obama’s entire life reeked of indolence.