"Superfluous" characteristics (from an evolutionary viewpoint)?

It’s amazing what runs through your head at 6 a.m. on a Sunday morning. Of course, my second thought was to come here and pose a question or two to the teeming millions…

There seem to be a number of human traits that could be deemed unnecessary to our survival. Such things as our ability to appreciate and/or make music, (I won’t include the visual arts because I feel that they originated as a form of communication before language was developed). But perhaps even stranger is our ability to be funny, to make jokes and to laugh. These seem to serve no ‘useful’ function in terms of our immediate survival nor the perpetuation of our species, and thus I wonder what led to the development of these ‘higher’ characteristics?

In other words, why are we funny? Survival is a serious business ya know, so how did our humour skills become so well developed?

For some reason I’m thinking of Sid Ceaser’s scenes in The History of the World Pt. I.

I could be wrong but I don’t think you’ll find specific genes for “funny” or “can dig Miles Davis.” Those are abilities of a highly developed brain. Some of our ancestors may have had the ability to appreciate humor or music but it wasn’t until culture and language developed those concepts did those abilities mean anything.

Sexual selection.

Chicks dig guys who are funny and/or musically talented. Therefore guys with humor or music enjor more reproductive sucess, and the genes for humor and music get passed on.

Music is a very complicated thing.

It’s been suggested that we’re evolved to associate emotional responses with tonal qualities because of the structure of our larynx. The pitch of the human voice changes under emotional stress.

As a result, we experience similar emotions to similar tonal qualities of musical instruments.

Genetics interact with environment in ways far more complex and subtle than might be readily apparent. The “unimportant” factor might have ramifications not obviously related to its primary expression. Over long time periods those subtle secondary effects can be overwhelming, and not directly genetic.

An example:

Suppose two notional tribes of humans, separated by continental distances, and having no genetic exchanges over millennial time frames. In one group, there happens to be a suite of genetic factors that strongly favor rhythmic and tonal facility, although humans have not yet developed music. The other tribe has several elements of that suite of genes, but not the entire set, which is necessary for the expression of that innate talent. (Hey, not all God’s children go rhythm.)

In group one, over the first few generations, some individuals begin humming, and expressing musical vocal themes. Pre language, but intentional, and emotional. Among such early Hummers, are women of childbearing years. In the other group, no such phenomenon occurs. The humming moms, like most moms, spend a lot of time with their newborns, only these moms hum to their babies. Their children listen. The non humming moms in the second tribe also make some noises to their infants, but not so often, and not sustained for as long as those which are musical in nature. (an unobvious, but distinctly likely consequence of musical expression.)

Now for a bit of ECD pedantry. Infants exposed to interactive verbal communication over long periods during the first eighteen months of life develop more thoroughly interconnected brain pathways than do those who do not experience such stimulation. (Actually, you can make that infant vertebrates of any species, but for now, let’s concentrate on humans.)

So, now tribe one, let’s call them the Hummers, has had three generations of humming moms, and the same number of generations have come in the Mumers. A thing begins to happen among the Hummers that does not happen among the Mumers. Statistically, highly developed brain functions are more common among the Hummers. These people will become more populous, in comparison because they are led or influenced by more intelligent members. And the members of the tribe will become more highly regarded when they move into nearby groups. That means that suite of genes which started the whole thing will be reproduced more widely, and survive longer.

Then synergy really gets a boost, when one of these smart Hummers starts teaching the tribe to hum together. A bunch of folks humming the same theme is a powerful, and mystical thing, in the earliest days when such things were possible. And, it makes the number of humming moms very high, statistically. It also creates a social pathway from observing infant, to participating tribe member. Lots of good social things happen. Ten generations later, and the Hummers are now thirty tribes, over a subcontinental region, and growing quickly in numbers. The suite of genes which gave us music has joined up with the suite of genes which gave us speech, and one day, someone starts to actually sing.

After that, the Mummers are not safe for long. The Singers now include verbal language in their entire developmental experience, from infancy. Language is given a boost beyond anything that just language itself is able to provide. And then some Singer with a good memory lives a very long life. Now you have Sagas, and in a couple more centuries, you have History. And by the way, that millennium I mentioned earlier is now passed, and guess what?

The Singers have spread over the entire continent, and absorbed the Mummers without even a verse.

Tris

One more time. Characteristics don’t have to be beneficial or necessary. It is sufficient that they not be too harmful. Arguing that all characteristics are in some way essential to survival is to play the game of intelligent design. The evolutionary point of view is that creatures are not designed for environments, they adapt to them by using existing characteristics in a novel way.

In addition, as has been pointed out by Triskadecamus above, we are not in any way fully informed as to the “usefulness” of characteristics. Our inability to see any “use” doesn’t in any way prove that there isn’t one.

Triskadecamus, Really! Come on now!

Hummers! Please tell me this was unintentional!
Humming Moms! Band Name!:eek:

::d&r::

Musicians with a sense of humor have been covered up with babes since Og and Grog toured Bedrock. Being musical and/or amusing has always been a high probability route for getting vaginal walls moist, legs open and eggs fertilized.

In addition to the above, please do not neglect social factors when imagining the details of human evolution. Factors that can increase social cohesion in a group would seem quite likely to have a positive efect on the evolutionary fitness of the group members.