This has probably been discussed here before, but for some reason I started thinking about this.
Bruce Wayne becomes Batman to fight crime. Likewise, Peter Parker becomes Spider-Man. For most superheroes, their civilian identity is who they “really” are, and the hero is an alter-ego.
But Superman turns the trope upside down. Superman (or Kal-El) is his true identity, and Clark Kent is the alter-ego, a persona he uses to disguise himself in the civilian world.
Are there any other superhero identities that are structured like this instead of the other way around? Wonder Woman might fit the bill, but I’m not well-versed in her backstory. Was she known as Diana Prince before she became WW?
Thor is just Thor, right? He doesn’t have any other identities as far as I know.
You’ve got it backwards. Superman’s close friends, those who know his alter ego, address him as “Clark”, not as “Superman”, or “Kal”. The name that he, personally, identifies with is Clark Kent, and if you ask him who his parents are, he’ll say John and Martha.
Batman, however, everything in his life is directed to him being Batman. While “Bruce Wayne” is the name he was called in childhood, nowadays, it’s just another mask he wears when it’s convenient.
Katar “Hawkman” Hol, space cop from Thanagar, started putting on a “Carter Hall” act while innocuously looking like a regular guy holding down a museum job instead of only ever presenting himself as The Flying Crimefighter Keen On Learning About Earth Police Methods.
Wonder Woman’s origin story has varied, but the basic one is that she is an Amazon (or perhaps demigod, her father being Zeus.) Diana Prince is a disguise.she originally assumed during WWII.
Many of the members of the Legion of Superheroes didn’t have a real separate identity and were legionnaires full time. Mon-el didn’t have a separate identity and I don’t recall any reference to their civilian life other than calling each other by their real names.
Plastic Man pretty much gave up his Eel O’Brian identity and lived as Plastic Man only. He had incentive, since Eel was a wanted criminal. He’d only go back to go undercover.
“‘Superman’ is what I can do. ‘Clark’ is who I am.”
That’s from the 90s TV show, Lois and Clark, which was fairly silly. But that quote is very accurate to the modern conception of Superman. It was different in the Silver Age.
The company’s cover story for the Homelander is that he is an alien who landed in the United States as an infant; in reality, he was grown in a secret VA laboratory, the progeny of genetic material taken from Stormfront, who was injected with Compound V while still a member of the Hitler Youth.
No name in the comics, supposedly “John” in the tv series.
Aquaman’s origin has varied also, but he basically is Aquaman. His powers were either given to him by his human scientist father, or are due to the fact that he is the son of a lighthouse keeper and an outcast of an aquatic race from Atlantis. I don’t think he used his human identity of Arthur Curry very much.
Absolutely. “Superman” allows Clark to use his powers to fight evil without giving up what is really important to him - his life as a reporter, his relationship with Lois, etc. “Bruce Wayne” allows Batman to finance his gadgets and to infiltrate areas of society that he can’t sneak into - just like Batman’s other secret identity (“Matches Malone”) allows him to infiltrate other areas of society. When Batman goes to a party as “Bruce Wayne,” he’s there to collect information for Batman, not to enjoy himself. When Superman has to leave a party that Clark is attending, it interrupts Clark’s real life.
The idea is, it’s not that wealthy man-about-town Lamont Cranston guns down crooks as The Shadow; it’s that Kent Allard, AKA The Shadow, passes himself off as Lamont Cranston while the real Cranston is, well, constantly vacationing.
Jules Feiffer wrote an essay on this, back in the 60s or 70s. (If anyone can find a link to it, I’d love to re-read it!) He noted how damaging to Clark’s self-esteem it must be to present himself as a cowardly, weak, milksop of a man, demeaning himself in the eyes of his boss, his best friend, and the woman he loves. “Clark Kent” wasn’t a real man, just a suit that Superman put on.
Give John Byrne credit (and he’s done a lot of harm, too) for his re-design of Superman in 1986, making it clear that Clark Kent is the real man, and Superman is just a suit he puts on to fight crime and save the world. Kent is a fully realized person, not just a cardboard persona.