I’m not really sure what to make of this. One the one hand, giving up on PA and MI is almost conceding the election as not getting at least on of those states seriously limits a path to victory in the Electoral College for DJT. On the other hand, it makes me think this may only be temporary or that there is some other strategy at work.
Bottom line, it is a strange thing to do this far out from Election Day.
Maybe, but of all the things a campaign spends money on, TV ads seem low on the list of effectiveness. (Currently. In the old days, I would admit TV was king.)
If they’ve given up on Michigan and Pennsylvania, then they’ve practically conceded because they’ll need every one of the other swing states to win it. Which they won’t do.
I suspect the money is being diverted to shenanigans.
This. Bill Stepien supposedly hates tv ad buying and prefers to concentrate money for online ads in social media, where the right has huge communities. They are far less expensive than television and can be targeted toward individuals, interests, and states with the new tools that have been developed over the past few years. That makes online advertising ideal.
It’s also basically invisible if you don’t live in the right-wing bubble. I don’t, so I have literally no idea what they are seeing or how many or when. I’ve seen articles about the 2016 campaign saying how effective they were in getting out the base. Not sure anybody really can quantify that, but it seems logical.
They’re not reaching independents or persuadables that way (granted, there are probably damn few of them left now), so if he’s off the air in two key states, so much the better.
To at least some extent they are. I see Trump|Pence ads all over the internet, and I’m not in the right wing bubble. I’m not sure, but I think I’ve even seen some right here on the SDMB.
Yeah, I’ve seen some Trump ads, especially on YouTube, and I live in freakin’ Oregon. I think they’re targeting these spots with less than surgical precision.
I definitely have. Oddly enough right before a Biden ad. But that makes sense in Florida even if we are not the targeted demographic in some ways (but are in others, specifically, age, since people younger and older than the SDMB as a whole are more likely to be Biden supporters.)
Not really. It just proves the fix is totally in in those states. No need to get real voters when you can supply fake ones more cheaply. Watch out for massive fraud, vote supression, “lost” ballots and found fraudulent ones, etc.
Or at least that’s my interpretation of the tea leaves. Switching to all-online all-hard RW media buys is also a very likely explanation. Which would have them appear to all but disappear for those outside the RW bubble.
I don’t think it means the fix is in. I also don’t think it means they are giving up. I think it’s more a reflection of the declining importance of TV and people cutting the cord.
I’m at least partially tongue in cheek here. But whenever your opposition does something that seems inexplicable, that merely means you’re not looking hard enough at more obscure possibilities.
No need for obscure possibilities. The Trump campaign has burned through more than $800 million since the beginning of the year. They have too many battlegrounds they need to compete on. They’re putting a lot of their resources in Florida (a must-win for Trump) and probably see Minnesota or Wisconsin as more likely to flip than PA or MI.
I’m really liking that consistent lead in WI. If he can keep that, MN and PA (MI being pretty close to a lock) in his column, Biden will have a good night. I would love if FL would go blue — if for no other reason than to deflate any effort by Trump to preemptively declare victory — but in my mind I’m resigned to Trump winning it. Even with FL, Trump has a difficult path to victory in this landscape.