IIRC, the sword in the stone miraculously appeared as a test to identify the King. So Sword and Stone (or Anvil, depending on your source) were miracles. no human put it in there.
The Sword in the Stone isn’t Excalibur/Caliburn, the sword he got from the Lady of the Lake.
IIRC, again, it first appears in Mallory. It’s been a long time since I read the old texts, but it ain’t in Geoffrey of Monmouth, and I don’t think it’s in Wace or Layamon.
The John Boorman movie Excalibur has Uther himself plunging it into a stone, but that seems to be the film’s original creation. Disney’s (and T.H. White’s) ** Sword in the Stone** shows it magically appearing, as in Mallory.
Interesting bit: An article in *Skeptical Inquirer[/i a few years back has photos of a Medieval sword embedded in an anvil in a Spanish church, suggesting this might be the origin of the meme. Nobody knows who put that sword in the anvil, either.
For a brief second after reading the headline, I thought it was going to be about an ICP take on Arthurian legend. However, I then realized that would probably read, “Sword in the stone … how the fuck did it get there?”
The sword given by the Lady in the Lake is Excalibur. Usually the sword in the stone is not Excalibur, but that varies from tale to tale.
I remember reading one version where it was Merlin who put the sword in the stone, magically, as a test for the local men to prove who was the one true King. Merlin, of course, already knew who it was intended for, so the spell was designed for Arthur to be the successful candidate.
Ever since reading that version I had always taken it to be definitive, but I realise now it wasn’t at all.
the conclusion that i’ve reached after various versions of the arthur myth is that the sword in the stone was just there - divinely. arthur pulls it out, becomes king, battles pellinore and it breaks. thus arthur has to go find another divine sword - excaliber.
excaliber can’t be the sword in the stone because the sword arthur uses against pellinore is fresh from the stone… and if it breaks he has to get a new excaliber? it just fits better if excaliber and the SITS are separate swords.
OR it could be that the sword in the stone is just a random feat of strength devised by the local smithy.
If I recall Mary Stewart’s Crystal Cave series correctly, she has Merlin finding the sword and hiding it in a stone for Arthur to retrieve. My memory is a bit hazy, though, and also I don’t remember whether or not this was Excalibur.
I’ve always been under the impression, however, that it was put there by Merlin. A wizard did it.
There we go. That makes more sense. Otherwise, the story is that he pulls this magical sword from the stone and then when some aquatic bimbo gives him a different sword, he just abandons it in favor of the new one, and it is never mentioned again?
I recall an old Wizard of Id strip: The King hands a sword to Sir Rodney and says, “Whoever pulls this sword out of a stone shall succeed me as king. Set it up in the marketplace and give everyone a try.” In the next panel Sir Rodney is walking back into the throne room, hunched over with pain-stars emanating from his lower back, and says, “How about whoever can stick it into the stone?!”
Note to the OP- the TV series plays very fast and loose with the Arthurian myth and legends. You will gain almost no insight into Arthurian lore from the TV show.