It’s Tacocopter, the latest high-tech business scheme. It’s not practical… yet. It’s not even legal… yet. And according to plentyofsources, it’s not even real.
But it’s pretty damn funny, and pretty damn genius. I think these folks sat down and asked “What is the most dangerous possible technology deliver the least valuable commercial product the the laziest possible customers?”
I think the same business model could be used to deliver emergency packs of cigarettes. Or crystal meth.
Hell, drone tipping may be the drunken fraternity prank of the future!
Seriously, I liked this comment by one of the founders:
[QUOTE=Star Simpson, Tacocopter co-founder]
Honestly I think it’s not totally unreasonable to regulate something as potentially dangerous as having flying robots slinging tacos over people’s heads … [O]n the other hand, it’s a little bit ironic that that’s the case in a country where you can be killed by drone with no judicial review.
[/QUOTE]
The developers of that system perhaps need to do a little research into the FAA requirements for getting its control system certified for use in US airspace.
The phrase “… in a country where you can be killed by drone with no judicial review” is factually inaccurate, also. But, hey, don’t let facts get in the way of such fine news reporting. :rolleyes:
No, there’s no way this ever becomes a company. I assume the guys behind it want to get attention so they have some name recognition when they try to get their real project off the ground. But yes, it’s hilarious. There’s a kind of stupid genius to it.
I love the advert at the bottom right of their webpage.
LobsterCopter - Taco Of The East!
Because mating the power of flight with the malevolence and generally terror-inspiring attributes of lobsters must have seemed a good idea at the time.
If the above is true and not just part of the Tacocopter story - Would this include remotely operated aerial vehicles for say survey or observation purposes? Would this also extend to using weather ballons?
The thing about the FAA rules is true. I out about it separately related to another issue.
And yes, it would preclude private, commercial use of UAVs for survey, observation or weather reporting. Some companies have already been stopped from doing it. But not government use – so presumably the US Weather Service or USGS could go ahead and do it if they wanted.