Sammy. Try to understand, it’s not you. We don’t know you. We only know you from what you post. You’re young and excited about technology. You let that excitement get in the way of reality sometimes. That’s why people get on your ass.
It’s not too late. All you have to do is listen to people who have more knowledge than you do in the fields you explore. Listen and learn. Asking “why” will never get you piled on. Telling experts that they are wrong because they won’t listen to you, will get you piled on.
You’re here in an world of people who have vastly different interests and education than you. Ask just about any question, and someone will have an answer or tell you where the answer is.
Free exchange of ideas, even far out ideas, is fine here. Your questions aren’t the problem, it’s your response to those who respond with facts you don’t like that leads to the problems.
If I was in your position I’d immediately unblock those who you’ve blocked.
I’d start asking “why” instead of telling experts how it really is.
A year from now, you’ll find that listening makes you much smarter than talking ever could.
I don’t even consider this an insult. I’ve taken IQ tests, I know what it is, and you should be able to tell it’s above average. If you can’t, well, that reveals a failing on your part, not mine. If you call a supermodel ugly, you’re just proving that you’re blind and they are not going to be hurt. Insults need to have a grain of truth to work.
What are you claiming reality about?
You do know that fog can be other liquids than water, and some liquids are stable enough to form a fog briefly in vacuum. Did you read Lost Moon by Jim Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger? Of course you didn’t. There was a visible fog of liquid oxygen vapor when they blew their oxygen tank.
Anyways even that wouldn’t be enough, but you’ve made meaningless insults about 8 more times in this thread as well. Really, making fun of my eyes? What kind of low brow insult is that?
Running coach, Darren Garrison, Czarism…what are they experts in?
Why should I listen to them if they won’t do more than make generic insults?
I do ask why. What kind of “expert” calls someone a nanodick? What kind of “expert” disagrees on every single thread I ever make but can’t give a technical reason why? Not only is that childish, if I did have a nanodick, it wouldn’t be my fault, now, would it? Why would that offend me?
No, what would offend me is the truth. I have a large dick but I rarely get to use it. Now that’s something to insult someone over. That would be genuinely hurtful if someone made fun of me for that. Since that would mean I was unsuccessful in my ‘spitting game’ to attract mates, something that would theoretically be within my control. If I had a nanodick, that would simply mean that nature decided not to equip me for that at all.
This is quite pedantic and irrelevant for the general point. Which is that if you have a fog, and want to move that fog, and all you have is a device that creates sharp, sudden impulses like a gun, you can in fact move the fog by shooting it if you load the gun with projectiles that are small relative to fog size.
So if a rubble pile asteroid were coming to the earth, you might have to use smaller nukes detonated very close to each major piece of that asteroid.
Running coach, what do you consider yourself an expert in?
I would say that “reading a comment about my dick size and assuming it applies to a different topic” is simple illiteracy, myself. Also, yeah, obdurism isn’t a word. Did you mean something with a root word of obstinate? Which all good scientists should be : you do have to assume basic laws of physics are correct or you’re not going to get anywhere, and ignore anyone like Darren Garrison who says otherwise.
You’ve made 30k posts here, but I got bored when the last 500 were about Trump. He’s a bad man and there’s nothing we can do about it, jeez. As for “ignore”, this simply means I choose when to read a post by you. Morgenstern said I should give you another chance but so far you haven’t even attempted to claim to be someone I should read the posts of.
Until you / they can figure out exactly how to freeze someone that isn’t currently dead* without killing them I’m pretty sure that is gonna be murder in most jurisdictions.
*'Cause ya ain’t reallllly dead if your brain ain’t dead, “mostly dead” ain’t something taught in med school!
CMC fnord!
Now, will I win that coveted spot on someone’s “Ignore List”?
Definition of obdurate
1 a : stubbornly persistent in wrongdoing an unrepentant, obdurate sinner
b : hardened in feelings The obdurate enemy was merciless.
2 : resistant to persuasion or softening influences obdurate in his determination
remaining obdurate to her husband’s advances —Edith Wharton
Definition of obstinate
1 : stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion obstinate resistance to change
2 : not easily subdued, remedied, or removed obstinate fever
Definition of similar
1 : having characteristics in common : strictly comparable
So “struggling” would be a rather poor interpretation of the facts given the root word I matched to has a similar definition. I am happy with the performance of my neural network on this task.
Sam. I didn’t say Running Coach. **Running Coach **has spam busting to do and we don’t want him wasting time in the pit. Why yesterday I saw RC take 2 full minutes to report one. I was disappointed.
Don’t you disappoint me too Sam. Learn to learn from people you feel are inferior. You might be surprised.