I’ve heard arguments in favor of televising it, from BOTH sides of the debate, with the rational boiling down to one thing…horror value.
The pro-death side, saying that seeing executions will scare people into not commiting crimes. And the anti-death people saying that seeing someone die will horrify the public into outlawing the practice. I suppose, by that logic, the anti-death people have more to gain by supporting televised executions—worst case, if it turns out their opponents were right, society still benefits from the crime deterrance. If they’re right, society turns against the death penalty.
Actually, I suppose that’s not the worst case scenario. The worst outcome I can imagine stems from the efforts to make American executions more humane—the fact that most(?) executions are carried out via lethal injection. From quite a few witness reports I’ve heard, these executions tend to be pretty “anticlimactic.” (You bring the prisoner in, strap him down, stick an IV in his arm, and a couple of minutes later, a doc pronounces him head. No flashing lights, sudden jolts, or wild thrashing. The prisoner just…fades away.)
Now, worst case, this won’t be horrifying enough to make people want to outlaw the death penalty (“That’s it? That was like when I had my dog euthenized…no, that was worse, because I actually liked Fido, and he didn’t murder anyone!”), or, by the same token, be scary enough to deter crime (“That’s it? If I kill somebody, IF they catch me, and if I get convicted, I spend 20 years in prison on appeal, and IF that doesn’t pan out…they put me to sleep like a dog?”). End result: neither side wins.
On the edges of my mind, I have some pithy comment forming…but I’m dead tired, and I can’t make it come out more good.
For the record, I suppose I’m for it.