Nor was it something I claimed; Dunawake’s post was similar to Lib’s post in that it helped to substantiate my claim that the allegations were made in the first place, something that had been sorely missing in this thread prior to their posts.
So, the claim is that right-wing propagandists were sitting in on the secretive meetings that Hillary had with her socialist friends and were therefore privy to ideas that they rejected, ideas that would have been bad, and that the right-wing propagandists therefore went out and told everyone that these bad ideas were going to become law, even though the secret socialists came out of their secretive socialist meetings with a proposal that did not include these bad ideas?
Good Christ, the logic of Scientology is looking downright reasonable next to this crapscicle of an argument.
Hell, he’s making Ann Coulter look sane and logical. The only thing that would make sense is that Starving Artist is a far-left extremist, trying to make the right look bad.
I didn’t say it was incomprehensible. only that lawmakers didn’t bother to read it. From what I understand, it’s SOP for them to only read summaries for long, involved bills.
Btw, anyone interested can watch Hillary’s eye-rollingly phony performance here. She appears at first to be hamming it up and having fun, and then gets serious in her cornpone right before she mentions "Mayur Palllmur…raht her frum…Trentin, New Jersey.
Why anybody would believe a word out of this woman’s mouth is a mystery to me. Frankly, I don’t think her supporters care whether she’s telling the truth about anything or not, they just know that she’s a Democrat and that’s good enough for them.
Not me. I believe the OP’s absolutely correct. Hillary Clinton wants to deny medical care people who can pay for it, and to throw doctors and patients in jail for some unknown reason. I don’t know why anyone is even arguing against this point. She was obvioulsy highly disappointed that she wasn’t able to throw people in jail for no reason while she was first lady (woman scorned and all that), and that disappointment has burned so fiercely that she is running for President just so she can have a chance to cheat folks out of medical care and throw them in jail again. I believe it; hell, I have to believe it. After all, it’s Starving Artist and as we all know, he’s never made a partisan statement in all his life.
Leaving aside the fact that ‘partisan’ doesn’t necessarily equal ‘wrong,’ what the hell are you talking about? I never said she wanted to deny affluent people medical care, only that she wanted to force them to accept government health care. And I never said she wanted to throw doctors–or anyone else–in jail for no reason. I said I’d heard or read that she wanted to impose penalties including jail or prison terms to anyone who tried to circumvent it by paying for it themselves (the patients) or by accepting payment for it (the doctors).
Now this may or may not be the case; no one seems to know.
But be that as it may, your characterization of my allegations is way off base, as I’m sure you know.
You ever see Trent Lott speaking to his constituency back home, instead of to the nation? When he’s speaking nationally, he has a bit of a drawl. When he’s speaking to a Louisiana audience, he sounds like he has a mouth full of mush.
It’s not just Hillary, it’s all of us. **Dangerosa **hasn’t lived in the south in more than 30 years, and she still finds herself starting to drawl when speaking to southerners. I’ve never even been to England, but I spent summers working at the MN Renaissance Festival doing a crappy English accent… and when I’m talking to British people, I find myself starting to sound like them. Mimicry is something we do as humans, to sound like others.
We get it, SA. You really intensely dislike the woman. Can you give it a rest?
Here’s the full clip of Hilary speaking - turns out she was quoting a southern hymn - and yes, she was putting on an affect, but she wasn’t hiding that she was putting on an affect. Both before and after the quoted part she’s speaking in her normal voice.
Dunawake, nice work on the links. Although one article dated back to 1996, the Cato Institute article was from last year. Since there is no evidence that Hillary’s plan ever included penalties on patients or penalties for seeking or offering medical care outside the government system, I’m wondering why the Cato Institute is bringing this up again. Surely they know that the myth has been debunked. I wonder if they are doing a little swiftboating.
Welcome to the SDMB!
That would not be the dalect common to the people she was addressing.
Starvin’ Darlin’, I challenge you not to vote for two white men yet again.
I’m sure a lot of people in this thread, myself included, would hardly count themselves amongst Hillary’s ‘supporters.’
We’ll still cheerfully debunk your Rush/Drudge/whoever talking points about her. But by now, if you were not blinded by your own special combination of partisanship and stupidity, you would have long ago realized that those folks have little regard for the truth. They simply fling a lot of shit at their targets, and hope some of it sticks.