Huh? I merely gave an example that reached 50.5% and said it was a majority. But in basic math, 50.1% is a majority. 50.00001% is a majority. Anything more than 50.000… % is a majority.
And, Mr. Lincoln, if you count the tail as a leg, how many legs does a dog have?
Your “definition” of majority of 100% is utter nonsense; no one defines it that way. You’re setting up a straw man.
And you crudely ran away from my question. When is 50%+1 not a majority?
I never said it wasn’t. I said that it is not the definition as you can have a majority with less than 50%+1 of the vote. Again: 99 votes. 50%+1 = 50.5. Explain to me how 50 votes which is less than 50.5 is not a majority of 99.
Answer this question: when is 100% not a majority?
So have you now proven that the definition of “majority” is 100%
How is that any different than your “gotcha” question “proving” you are right? Again, explain how your definition includes 50 out of 99 as a majority. I’ll wait.
I even made another thread to get it out of this one and I think that one was closed because it’s like two kids in the back seat on a loooooooong road trip.
And like those trips with my sister, I’m right and she’s wrong.
Moderating:
This thread is NOT an appropriate place to argue the definition of “majority”. Drop it or take it elsewhere.
If anyone sees another post on the topic, please report them and I’ll issue warnings.
As a young boy I lived for a few years on Tybee Island off the coast from Savannah GA and the houses there were all built like that. Tybee is about three feet above the high tide line and storm surges would easily flood ground level.
More countries named for individuals:
Georgia: St George
Marshall Islands: John Marshall, Royal Navy officer, 1700s
The Philippines: Philip II of Spain
Kiribati: John Gilbert, Royal Navy officer, 1700s. (the name is the Gilbertese rendition of Gilbert)
Solomon Islands: King Solomon
A bald eagle in Missouri that was believed to be injured and couldn’t fly was rescued and brought in. X-rays showed it was okay, but had eaten a raccoon and was too heavy to fly.
That’s also a very common form of construction around here, especially in buildings from the 1960s and 1970s. Because building codes generally don’t allow street-level apartments, and not everything can be mixed-use, builders would usually just skip building a ground floor, and often use the space for parking:
I live in a building like that myself - nines stories, on columns, with parking beneath and around it.