Terri Schiavo, Now that we have all calmed down

Allegations of your grinding corpses into fruit smoothies are also unresolved.

Excellent point. What I want to know about is the autopsy, where is it? What did it show? The time has passed, if the results are not made public then something is wrong. Does anyone know anything about it?

That question was answered in post #11.

I think the correct term here is unsubstantiated but then that diminishes the rhetoric of your argument, doesn’t it?

Before this gets out of hand, I would once again like to register my objection to the means of death. I was hoping that this would open up a rational debate about active euthanasia, but it unfortunately didn’t.

Nobody deserves do die due to starvation. To me, that’s the bottom line.

It was starvation and dehydration with medication for pain.

A good compromise pisses everybody off.

Her euthanasia could have been achieved far more painlessly in a matter of minutes.

I’m impatient to see the autopsy results. Soon.

Years ago The Economist (or maybe The Times) had an article describing a ‘painful death by starvation.’ A few days later there was an odd (and so typically British) letter. I did not cut it out, but it was along the lines of:

Sir,
I had the misfortune of experiencing starvation twice, once in (some horrid Nazi place) and again when my yacht was dismasted during an unfortunate storm while completing the 1950 Round The World Race.

In both cases I lost well over fifty pounds and must say I found my situation distressing but not especially painful.

Signed,
Alford Blimp,
Colonel, The Guards
DSO and all that …

Experiences vary, I guess. I once had the pleasure of going without food for a week, and I can tell you that without a doubt it hurt like hell. Truthfully, the only thing that hurt worse was starting to eat again.

Based upon my own personal experience (anecdotal though it might be), starving to death would be a really bad way to go.

But it would be considerably less painful if you had no cerebral cortex. If the US allowed euthanasia, then the remotest possibility of feeling pain could have been avoided. Since it isn’t, the only ethical alternative was pursued. I find it hard to believe that a person sufficiently brain dead as to be unresponsive to stimuli would have felt any pain associated with starvation.

Even if I concede that Terri Schaivo was unable to feel pain (which I will for the purposes of this discussion), that was one case. This is not an all-that-unfrequent occurrence, even among people that ARE capable of feeling pain.

We need to do something about that. Again, just my opinion.

In that case, we need to take a hard look at euthanasia. If there are situations where the medical outlook is hopeless for any sort of consciousness and if we wish to avoid the unpleasantries of starvation, then we need to choose either to legalize euthanasia in limited cases or resign ourselves to keep such people alive in perpetuity.

Agreed.

Properly speaking, Schiavo was dehydrated to death.

Why, precisely, would the autopsy results have anything to do with whether or not Ms Schiavo agreed to the course of action that was followed?

I thought that she received meds for pain. Am I misremembering?

Waste

She received two small doses of morphine:

That was on March 29, three days before she died. She received no additional morphine after that time.

And that is fucked up. I don’t see how someone with a brain stem that had become liquid could feel pain anyway. It seems to me, though, that if they had given her what would be considered pain meds in line with what a conscious person might get, then they would have been pre-emptively covering their asses.

“We as a society” should never have been involved in the first place. That, I think, is by far the most disturbing aspect of this case.

Society made the laws. Society set up the courts. Society appointed the judges. How much more could Society have involved.

It is remarkable, but I suppose a handful of Americans die each week just as TS did. She became a cause celeb only because of her parents. Those poor folks really suffered. All the more because of the people who gathered around them.

So, under your concept all those executed under Bush during his time as the Governor of Texas were unjust as they probably didn’t agree to such an action before hand.

I will reluctantly share a little theory I came up with when all this fuss n’ feathers was boiling over.

I believe the hand of God influenced the media saturation we witnessed, for this reason: God does not want Jeb Bush to become President.

Think about it- the Religious Right, which Jeb would need to secure the nomination, holds him somewhat responsible for her death, since he didn’t pull a George Wallace and send in the National Guard to reinsert her feeding tube. No way he can win their support now.

Yes, I know I’m crazy, thankyewverymuch.