Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont - March 4th, 2008

Waterloosday.

Diebold accidentally releases results of 2008 election

I for one welcome our shadowy overlords.

Awesome 'toon!

It’s funny because it’s TRUE!

:wink:

Check this out: http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/

Slate made a delegate calculator for the remaining contests. Put in your best guesses and see how it ends up.

It’s not a very good counter, unfortunately: it assumes that all of a state’s delegates are allocated proportionately at the state level.

But most of them are allocated proportionately at the congressional-district level, which is what makes life interesting. In a CD with 6 delegates, a 58-42 win doesn’t do you any more good than a 58-42 loss; in one with 5 delegates, a 69% win doesn’t do you any more good than a 50.1% win. On the whole, it makes it harder to translate a middlin’ popular majority into a delegate majority of the same size.

Except in heavily black districts. Thanks to a few rounds of the GOP’s packing as many black votes as possible into as small a number of districts as possible, almost every state has a few districts that aren’t just majority black, but overwhelmingly black. And since the max of 8 delegates per CD goes to the districts that vote overwhelmingly Dem in general elections, which tend to be the overwhelmingly black districts, those tend to be districts that Obama can win 6-2 or 7-1.

I don’t know that I could do anything about the black districts in the counter, but I could easily adjust the function that converts % of the vote into numbers of delegates. Maybe take the x^3 function on the [-1,1] interval, which flattens out nicely in the middle, and do appropriate stretchings and shiftings to match it up to the [0%,100%] interval on the x-axis, and the [0, # delegates] interval on the y-axis.

Hilarious. Absolutely fabulous!!
I love the crawl of “news” across the bottom. Peace talks between Sweden and Finland. :smiley:

Even better, “Conjoined twins in Dayton, OH discovered to just be standing close together.”

I sure hope they don’t lose interest after the primary.

That’s the biggest concern I have about Obama supporters.

It hasn’t even been two months since Iowa, and it’s six months to the election.

I hope the love lasts.

It’ll last. Don’t bet that come fall, college campuses around the country will be frothing at the mouth for an Obama victory over McCain. Let’s just get him to the Nomination first shall we. One Day at a Time.

Clinton camp raises specter of lawsuits challenging the Texas primary process.

Of course, more moving of the goal posts. Clinton’s campaign knows she does notoriously bad in caucuses, and Obama does very well. This is inside bullshit that I think everyone will see right through. Just because Clinton raised 35 million in February - nealry 20 million less than Obama - she’s thinking it’s a resurgance…More BS. There are not enough rolleyes to be placed for her crap!

…nevermind…

Sounds like the Clinton camp is now saying Obama needs a sweep Tuesday. I don’t think I can follow that logic.

And they’re moving the goalposts yet again:

:rolleyes: Yeah, he’s won 11 straight, but if he doesn’t win 15-straight, well, he’s the one in trouble.

You know what pisses me off about all of this shit? It’s simply shades of Bush. When was the last time we had a President that told the truth at least some of the time? Bush is 100 percent spin, obviously. Can you believe he told us yesterday that there wasn’t going to be a recession? Does he think anyone believes him anymore? With HRC it’s more of the same. It’s simply bullshit every time she opens her mouth. I’m sick of it.

What the HRC camp ought to worry about though is if she didn’t set the bar high enough. I am not saying that Obama needs to win all four, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he did. What will she do then? I really hope that this crap is over on the 4th of March. Hillary has ruined every chance she has at being humble and bowing out. She should do it before March 4, and I don’t htink she will.

Now this is getting ridiculous:

That’s an interesting allegation.

Something profound is being said here, alright, but it isn’t what Wolfson thinks it is.

1/4 of those get behind HRC and Obama wins the nom. Or did you forget about those other 300 that would presumably not be sitting on their hands?

Hey, you have to remember that DrDeth is the one who predicted

and still (as of two days ago) thinks that Gore “has a chance.”

Handicapping this cycle has not exactly been his/her forte. :slight_smile: