Um, yes. Bleeding, tears, scars, stretchmarks, weight gain, long term immune system problems, and so on. Not to mention nastier things in some cases. Here’s a recent threadmentioning some unpleasant pregnancy/childbirth related problems.
I guess i was one of the few lucky ones to survive childbirth. Still, women have been getting pregnant since the beginning; you make it sound like no woman would ever want this horrible thing to happen to her. yet it happens, shit happens, cavities happen. We deal with them.
So fetus’ aren’t alive? Maybe we can extend that to husbands or humans we want gone. Or maybe the state should decide? I get the feeling you are not a libertarian.
Or, you can’t “deal with it” and suffer permanent harm. And regardless, you are talking about forcing that upon women; not them taking the risk of such complications of their own free choice.
No, I’m not a libertarian; not that being one is a compliment. One of the more disgusting political groups around in my opinion.
As for husbands and other people, they ARE people; a fetus is not. Your comparison is a false one.
Most couples only want healthy white infants, if they’re white. There are more infants than there are couples wanting to adopt. The problem is that the infants are not considered exactly perfect. This could be something like being mixed race, or nonwhite, or it could be something like having Fetal Alcohol Syndrome or born addicted to crack.
Pregnancy is an expensive condition. Most poor women can’t afford to buy enough new clothes to get them through the pregnancy, let alone afford the medical care necessary.
I’ve been damaged by being pregnant. I have partially detached retinas, among other things. While pregnant, I suffered from toxemia/pre-eclampsia, which was both painful and damaging. I was on partial bed rest from the 7th month on, and during my last month I was on complete bed rest. I don’t think that these conditions are exactly common, but they certainly aren’t rare. Giving birth was the most painful event of my life, and of course I wasn’t offered enough pain relief because I was told it was harmful for the baby.
Yet pregnanacy is a natural thing. Also, getting cancer is a lot more damaging and it happens randomly to people, they don’t have to have sex to get it. Where are all these women being forced to have sex?
If you like statistics, then the one almost certainty we can say is that making abortion illegal doesn’t decrease the rate of abortion. Abortion rates are almost identical in Africa (where it is mostly unsafe and illegal) and Europe (where it is mostly safe and legal), and are actually lowest of all in Northern and Western Europe.
So, what would happen if abortion was made illegal?
Women who have abortions now would still have them, but they would either travel to a different jurisdiction, obtain an illegal (and probably unsafe) abortion or obtain a legal abortion because of extenuating circumstances (rape, severe foetal abnormality incompatible with life, life of mother exception).
70,000 women die worldwide every year from unsafe abortion- if death as a real risk of having sex doesn’t put people off it, I doubt jail-time would.
Lots of interesting information at the Guttmacher Institute.
Well, that’s a big fat “yes”. Women can actually be quite good at oppressing other women.
In any case, what the net gain from banning abortion in the U.S.? Surely there’s a cost/benefit analysis waiting in the wings.
Pro: more babies; more money to Canadian and Mexican abortion clinics.
Con: more oppression; more injuries from improvised abortions; more law-enforcement resources tied up in a futile prohibition effort; more money to criminal organizations who will add mifepristone to their existing illegal drug shipments; fewer health-care resources for women since doctors who provide abortions typically provide other OB/GYN services and throwing them in jail deprives society of those services; more newborns being killed or abandoned; more women abandoning their educations; more woen trapped in cycles of poverty; more women being killed by boyfriends who definitely don’t want children; more crime 15 years down the road when the unwanted babies start to grow up…
I recognize the moral satisfaction of saying “abortion should be banned”. I just wish pro-lifers would take two minutes to think about what that would mean.
The hell you say! Sure, abortion wouldn’t dominate the politics of the SC, but in most states, every legislative session and every state-level election would be a rancorous abortion debate. Little else would get done and there’d be more divisiveness at the local level. At least that’s what I would predict.
RvW has kept a lid on the abortion debate, relatively speaking.