Yes. But what I am saying is there will not be the votes. His no longer being there will give plausible cover to those arguing it’s moot and refusing to vote for it and I have no reason to doubt there would be at least 34 of them.
It looked to me like something police wear in the TV shows I watch. Does that mean this guy was police? Or did the rioters order them from the military/LEO supply store?
IMVHO, the worst thing about the electoral college as-is is the winner-take-all aspect.
If I could change it:
The voters of each congressional district would choose one elector (using the same ballot that is used in the general election).
The voters of each state as a whole would choose two electors.
The electors would each vote for two people for Pres and VP.
The person who gets the most votes becomes the pres.
The person who gets the second-most votes becomes the VP.
Steps 1 and 2 give each state the same number of electors they currently have. Steps 3-5 are, of course, the way the Pres and VP were originally chosen. Ranked-choice voting would be used.
The procedure for breaking a possible tie would be established well before the election – a run-off vote, a series of coin flips, whatever. (My choice: All individuals involved in the tie roll 5d20, and high roll wins. The same five dice would be rolled by all candiddates, of course, to prevent accusations of loaded dice.)
Alternatively, the two electoral votes from step 2 would both go automatically to the winner of the state’s popular vote.
Just had to post this quote from GreenWyvern’s link above to the John Scalzi article. I think it hits the nail on the head:
There was a Republican mob at the Capitol yesterday because the GOP put them there . Not just yesterday, or through the course of the election, or the four years of the Trump administration. The storming of the Capitol is the (current) culmination of a decades-long project by Republicans, a project of denial, in which they didn’t recognize the validity of power being shared, or the equality of the other party, or the supremacy or desirability of democracy, if democracy meant a diminishment of their power and goals.
Problem with this, it makes gerrymandering of congressional districts even more desirable to the parties. Rather assign the state’s electoral votes proportional to the statewide popular vote.