The Ape Man (1943)

The other day I picked up one of those “Five horror movies for $6” discs at the local discount book store. They’re all low-budget Bela Lugosi thrillers from the early Forties.

I watched “The Ape Man”, and was impressed despite myself. Moved quickly, reasonably good production values, not boring.

The movie opens with a quick burst of exposition, as Dr. Randall explains to Agatha Brewster, returning form overseas, that her brother isn’t missing; he’s in hiding. Certain experiments with the glandular system have worked all too well. We cut to the lab, where Bela is huddled in a cage; his face and hands are hairy, and when he stands up, it’s with a gorilla’s stoop. He explains his predicament (he can’t manage to change back to human, and his mood swings from normal to wildly violent) to his sister, and collapses against her, crying.

It was a surprisingly powerful scene. Even with his career in the dumps, Lugosi could deliver if the script was good. I was impressed.

The film has some other interesting stuff going on. The heroine (who is replacing a newspaper photographer who’s going into the Army) accuses the hero of being “4-F”. He explains that he’s “1-A”, and is due to enter the Navy in 30 days. Reminds you that the movie was made in 1943.

And the ending was wild. After the usual thriller-type ending, the movie goes on to completely explode the fourth wall.

A rather goony-looking character, who has appeared at odd moments to provide hints and guidance to our hero, turns to the camera and reveals himelf to be the Author!!!

Oh, and it’s got Louise Currie. Nice to see her in something besides the Captain Marvel serial. Cheekbones to die for, and a good way with a snappy line.

I grew up watching this on WPIX’s “Chiller Theater”. They must’ve owned a copy, because they showed it all the time, and it was featured in their opening montage (back in the early 1960s, before they changed the opening to the animated 6-fingered hand).

I started a thread on this a year or two ago – I, too, had picked up a cheap DVD of it and watched it for the first time in years. I also got another cheap and surprisingly similar flick, The Ape, starring a slumming Boris Karloff. In both films the mad doctors are interested in apes because they’re studying ape spinal fluid serum for a possible cure for polio. This was apparently a very real line of research at the time, and polio was a “live” issue. The eventual Salk and Sabin vaccines results from a very differrent avenue of research, but the films gor made because they featured a very real and timely scientific issue that had a natural tie-in to danger (how much sexier of a horror draw do you want that Apes?)