The moon landings must have been faked. You know why? Because there is no moon! That’s right. The moon doesn’t even exist. You can’t land on something that isn’t there. The big conspiracy is that the government wants us to believe in the moon. So there. 
Aw, fun. 
You should see a Doctor about that memory problem of yours.
He only gets out of his straightjacket and to a computer once in a while.
I personally saw Apollo XVII lift off. Why the government would spend all that money on repeats is beyond me.
Video of the conspirators, who have British accents so you know they are evil:
(The British faked the moon landing to cover up that an eccentric inventor and his dog did it first.)
Hey no shit, right? I remember feeding this guy (or a guy very much like him) to my anti-fuckwittery device on Usenet.
Good times, man, good times.
Yeah – and the ISS is also fake – every time I look it up with a telescope, I can see it – the telescope shows me a little picture of it.
How they do it, you ask? No telescope can be sold WORLDWIDE without the ISS simulator in it - it s a cover up conspiracy…
… there are no Airplanes either, they actually brainwash you into thinking that you travelled and there is only YOU in the world – everyone else is a figment of your imagination.
Francis?
Alas, the Irish Space Program has been sadly underfunded. Thus the lag in civilizing the moon…
Dear sir,
Unfortunately, the Nigerian Ministry of Telecommunications will not allocate the bandwidth that I need to watch your videos. However, if you will permit me to mail you the sum of 4.2 million dollars which I am holding in trust for the NMoT, perhaps you would be willing to purchase us the internet that we need. I eagerly await your reply.
Rev. Jesophat P. Bailywick
God bless you always!!! :):)
Now now, not all of use March posters are shit.
In this case though, OP is F.O.S and needs to get outside and seek some fresh air.
I’m thinking you were a little soft on your conclusion. Otherwise, I’m in complete agreement.
No. No, it wasn’t. I laughed, sure. And it sounds like you did too. But that wasn’t because it was funny. It wasn’t funny.
Sorry I didn’t stick around to do any followup posting; the cybercafe I was in closed half an hour early unexpectedly.
I see that almost all of the posts are empty ad hominems.
There were only a few which addressed the actual issues.
This issue was addressed
(2:35 time mark)
Anyone can exactly duplicate the movement of the flag here on earth by trotting by it at about a forty five degree angle.
We know he didn’t touch the flag because it started moving before he got close enough to touch it as these two analyses show.
This doesn’t make the proof of a hoax go away. There are lots of plausible scenarios that would explain this.
Countries can have secret agreements.
Governments can be bribed and blackmailed.
There may have been an unmanned lander on the moon sending prerecorded dialogue.
MythBusters’ lame attempt to obfuscate the anomalies has been debunked.
The Clavius site which defends Apollo is obviously a government attempt at damage-control.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125628
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=8940846&postcount=5
Instead of all this empty rhetoric, let’s hear some actual analyses of the anomalies.
That’s no where near 110 cites. Slacker!
Ad hominens? Maybe. Mine sure was. This is the Pit, buddy. Suck it up.
Empty? Not a chance.
Your logic doesn’t follow. Just because we’ve discovered a place does not mean that people will want to live there.
Delaware is my cite.
Looks like spring break is here…
Don’t be so sure. This cite clearly must have been available yesterday when you excerpted it.
But now it’s been censored. They’re really fast. And they took down a whole domain to do it.
Holy shit! It came back.