But that is the point. They did the most (won a Grammy) with the least (no apparent ability in anything). Every other band that gets mentioned here has had someone say, “Oh, but X was actually a good musician,” or, “Y may not have been able to play but they had great song-writing skills.” Milli Vanilli seems to be the only group that actually had NO abilities, yet still made a name for themselves.
We are looking at (accomplishments)/(ability). When the divisor is zero they go to infinity.
But having a good voice is one aspect of musical talent, and Elvis had a GREAT voice. He might not have been a songwriter or an instrumental musician, but he FELT those songs, and his tone and phrasing conveyed a lot of emotion and style (see also Sinatra, Frank). There are legitimate reasons to trash Elvis in retrospect, but lack of talent is definitely not one of them.
Milli Vanilli was a creation of a guy named Frank Farian, who created the group, and hired the dancers as frontmen. Of course, it’s not exactly a music industry secret that attractive people with limited talent are hired to perform the actual songs, while some producer is the real musical talent behind those hit songs. But usually the front person actually sang the track that the producer used in the final mix, even if it takes a lot of technical wizardry to make it sound good.
The real scandal of Milli Vanilli was that the two guys who were the ostensible frontmen didn’t do anything except dance and lip-synch and pose for album covers. But even if they had actually sang the tracks, it still would have been Frank Farian who “really” created the songs. The two frontmen didn’t “do the most” with limited musical talent, musically they didn’t contribute anything to Milli Vanilli.
One little irony is that, by hiring a singer who could sing, Farian didn’t need to apply so much wizardry to the track.
I actually thought that was hilarious. The music was as good as it had been before (which was not very, IMO), but the fact that it was created by unphotogenic artists was the scandal. Apparently a CD made by ugly people is worth $3 less than one made by beautiful people, if we cuse the settlement of the suit as a guide.
Yeah, Milli Vanilli was a weird, weird scandal. It’s exactly the same album as it was before. And there are plenty of album covers that have beautiful people who had nothing to do with the album, like that Tiajuana Brass album with the girl covered with whipped cream. And there are groups that feature dancers as an integral part of their live show. And there are groups that are essentially one guy who does everything, but he hires session musicians when he tours. And people lip-synching to their own vocal tracks isn’t unknown. Milli Vanilli just combined all these into one unpalatable package.
That’s about it right there. I was convinced at the time that the only people who were complaining were schoolgirls who only bought the album because Rob & Fab were “cute”.
You don’t consider Jerry Harrison a good player at the time the band was formed? I’ve always considered him as the “okay, now let’s find a real musician to teach us how to play” guy for that group of art students.
I’ve heard Peter Buck saying this forever, and I have to call bullshit. I’ve got the bootlegs from the early days - a few from 1980, pre-recording-career - and Buck was playing the same arpeggiated guitar figures he did later on the albums. They even did songs live in '80 that were later released on albums (“Harborcoat”, etc.) that were far more advanced than any garage band could manage. Also, as far as I know, Mike Mills (and, I believe, Bill Berry) was already a multi-instrumentalist by the time the band formed. I never know if it’s false modesty or myth-making Buck’s engaged in when he talks about how talentless they were when they started.
Agreed. Ever tried to play a song from Chronic Town or Murmur? Nothing simple about Buck’s playing.
Mills and Berry had played in other bands since high school. Both of them were well-versed musicians. Buck, of course, was the record collector and clearly listened to a few Byrds albums. Funnily enough, the later R.E.M. albums are the least technically complex…
Milli Vanilli may have been completely talentless, but their success was limited. Britney Spears, on the other hand, has achieved incredible fame with only a little more musical ability (i.e., she has a halfway decent voice).