Elementary.
You don’t really understand dark matter at all. I do. Dark matter fills the space unoccupied by particles of matter and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
You gots nuffin due to you unwillingness to understand the space unoccupied by particles of matter has mass.
There is no such thing as dark matter as a clump of stuff traveling with the matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Aether has mass, physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
I am not confusing dark matter with dark energy.
I understand dark energy is the aether continuously emitted into the Universal jet. I understand what is referred to as ‘dark matter’ is actually the aether which fills the space unoccupied by particles of matter which exist in it and move through it. What you mistake for the density of the dark matter is actually the state of displacement of the aether.
If you don’t like the term dark mass then user the term aether, ether, plenum, quintessence, quantum foam, quantum vacuum or whatever else you want to label it.
‘Empty’ space has mass which is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
Yeah, it’s dark energy. Not the ‘big bang’. In the ‘big bang’ space and time themselves are supposed to be getting created/expanding.
This is incorrect.
The Universal jet is emitting aether into three dimensional space causing matter to move outward and away from each other in three dimensional space.
There is zero evidence space and time can be created/expand. And saying the ‘big bang’ is evidence of it is circular logic and a statement, not an explanation as to how space and time are expanding/created.
And stop saying ‘we’ don’t know what dark energy is. I know dark energy is aether continuously emitted into the Universal jet.
I’m not interested in what you don’t know. I’m explaining to you what dark energy is.
I’m explaining to you the notion of a ‘big bang’ is incorrect.
Our Universe is a larger version of a galactic polar jet. Dark energy is aether continuously emitted into the Universal jet.
It’s not the Big Bang, it’s the Big Ongoing.
Do you have any experiments to confirm you supposition? Do you have any predictions for things that would not be predicted by the generally accepted model?
Two things I can think of - if dark matter in the usual sense isn’t holding together galaxies with inadequate visible mass, what is?
Second, if “empty” space has mass, we should be able to measure its gravity, or at least see discrepancies in gravity as predicted from the usual model with gravity in your model.
As for me, I’m smelling a weird variant of the Steady State theory here.
‘The Milky Way’s dark matter halo appears to be lopsided’
“the emerging picture of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way is dominantly lopsided in nature.”
The Milky Way’s halo is not a clump of dark matter traveling along with the Milky Way. The Milky Way’s halo is lopsided due to the matter in the Milky Way moving through and displacing the aether, analogous to a submarine moving through and displacing the water.
The Milky Way’s halo is the state of displacement of the aether.
The Milky Way moves through and curves spacetime.
The Milky Way’s halo is curved spacetime.
The state of displacement of the aether is curved spacetime.
The state of displacement of the aether is gravity.
The ‘missing mass’ is the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the matter which is displaced by the matter.
‘Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein’
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
“Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else-with the help of small floats, for instance - we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics - if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium.”
if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the aether as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that aether consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium having mass which is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
“the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places”
The state of the aether at every place determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.
Our Universe is a larger version of one of the following images of a galactic polar jet.
http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2012/amultiwavele.jpg
Matter is moving outward and away from us in three dimensional space.
[QUOTE=mpc755]
You don’t really understand dark matter at all.
[/QUOTE]
No, I don’t, nor do I pretend to…which means I know at least one more thing that you don’t, which is that neither of us REALLY knows what dark matter is. I know what many scientists THINK it is (or at least, my understanding of what they think it is). You, apparently, saw the latest Thor movie and were suitably impressed. 
If it does, then it would be measurable…the reason they call it ‘dark’ is because it’s not measurable, at least by anything we have yet. I think you have a very flawed understanding of any of this stuff, which is fine…except you apparently think you are an expert on this stuff and have all the arrogance of someone who is clueless on a subject but thinks they know better than everyone else. You remind me of the King of Clad trying to discuss Egyptology and refuting ‘mainstream’ science with gut feelings and suppositions coming from his backside.
No, probably not, since it’s clear you don’t have any idea what either dark energy OR dark matter is, wrt main stream thought. What you have is wild supposition that doesn’t even rise to the level of hypothesis, let alone theory, taking more seemingly from Greek mythology than from science.
Where did the universe come from, then? Was it always here? Where does your mystical magical aether come from? Hesiod?
You talking out your ass just sounds like farts, to me. You can explain all you like, but until you back that up with more than your assertion that it’s so you are just talking out of your ass.
And your proof of this is your assertion…your cite is your post! Got it.
Where does the aether supposedly come from? A universe sized white hole? And what is your proof for any of this? The Big Bang theory has been tested and thus far has survived the test of time…what you are saying in here isn’t even a hypothesis and has basically zero evidence or proof backing it up beyond your assertions.
There is evidence of the aether every time a double slit experiment is performed, it’s what waves.
How did you come to understand dark matter so thoroughly? Do you work at a particle research lab or did you just pick it up reading the internet?
I did this experiment in freshman physics. I don’t recall any of my profs ever saying it was due to the aether, however. It is a cool experiment that demonstrates that light has both wave and particle like properties, as well as some interesting implications of quantum mechanics, but I don’t think you understand what the experiment is actually demonstrating or what it means, sadly.
Intuition and common sense.
The Earth displaces ‘space’. What do we mean by ‘space’? What is being displaced? Are we referring to the notion of three dimensional space or what fills ‘empty’ space? We are referring to what fills ‘empty’ space. What fills ‘empty’ space is called the aether.
The Earth displaces the aether. How does the Earth displace the aether? In order to be displaced the aether must physically occupy three dimensional space. In order to physically occupy three dimensional space the aether must have mass.
Here are some articles where the observed physical phenomenon is correctly described by the matter moving through and displacing the aether.
‘Galactic Pile-Up May Point to Mysterious New Dark Force in the Universe’
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/01/musket-ball-dark-force/
“The reason this is strange is that dark matter is thought to barely interact with itself. The dark matter should just coast through itself and move at the same speed as the hardly interacting galaxies. Instead, it looks like the dark matter is crashing into something — perhaps itself – and slowing down faster than the galaxies are. But this would require the dark matter to be able to interact with itself in a completely new an unexpected way, a “dark force” that affects only dark matter.”
It’s not a new force. It’s the aether displaced by each of the galaxy clusters interacting analogous to the bow waves of two boats which pass by each other.
‘Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies’
“Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely.”
The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through and displacing the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring as the galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.
‘Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter’
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html
“Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water.”
The ‘pond’ consists of aether. The galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether. The ripple created when galaxy clusters collide is a wave in the aether.
‘The Milky Way’s dark matter halo appears to be lopsided’
“the emerging picture of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way is dominantly lopsided in nature.”
The Milky Way’s halo is not a clump of dark matter traveling along with the Milky Way. The Milky Way’s halo is lopsided due to the matter in the Milky Way moving through and displacing the aether, analogous to a submarine moving through and displacing the water.
Wave-particle duality is a moving particle and it’s associated wave.
“While the founding fathers agonized over the question ‘particle’ or ‘wave’, de Broglie in 1925 proposed the obvious answer ‘particle’ and ‘wave’. Is it not clear from the smallness of the scintillation on the screen that we have to do with a particle? And is it not clear, from the diffraction and interference patterns, that the motion of the particle is directed by a wave? De Broglie showed in detail how the motion of a particle, passing through just one of two holes in screen, could be influenced by waves propagating through both holes. And so influenced that the particle does not go where the waves cancel out, but is attracted to where they cooperate. This idea seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.” - John Bell
In the following articles Louis de Broglie describes wave-particle duality as a moving particle and it’s associated wave in a hidden subquantic medium.
‘Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE’
*“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his “Theory of light quanta”. I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”
“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”*
“For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity.”
“the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave”
NON-LINEAR WAVE MECHANICS A CAUSAL INTERPRETATION by LOUIS DE BROGLIE
“Since 1954, when this passage was written, I have come to support wholeheartedly an hypothesis proposed by Bohm and Vigier. According to this hypothesis, the random perturbations to which the particle would be constantly subjected, and which would have the probability of presence in terms of [the wave-function wave], arise from the interaction of the particle with a “subquantic medium” which escapes our observation and is entirely chaotic, and which is everywhere present in what we call “empty space”.”
The wave of wave-particle duality is a wave in the hidden subquantic medium.
In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the hidden subquantic medium passes through both. As the wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave guiding the particle. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit destroys the cohesion between the particle and its associated wave in the hidden subquantic medium, the particle continues on the trajectory it was traveling and does not form an interference pattern.
The notion of dark matter that travels with the matter is incorrect. The space unoccupied by particles of matter has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through.
"If a hidden sub-quantum medium is assumed, knowledge of its nature would seem desirable. It certainly is of quite complex character. It could not serve as a universal reference medium, as this would be contrary to relativity theory." - Louis de Broglie
The hidden sub-quantum medium is the mass which fills the space unoccupied by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it and is what waves in a double slit experiment.
Intuition and common sense don’t seem like building blocks for an understanding of theoretical physics. Just sayin’. Common sense doesn’t tell you that the faster you’re traveling the slower time is passing for instance.
Everything is with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists, including the rate at which atomic clocks tick.
The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is determined by the state of the aether in which it exists. In terms of general relativity, the greater the mass per volume of the matter the greater the displacement of the aether, the greater the force exerted toward and throughout the atomic clock by the displaced aether the slower the atomic clock ticks. In terms of special relativity, the faster a clock moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more aether the clock displaces the more force the displaced aether exerts toward and throughout the atomic clock the slower the clock ticks.
Curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.
“Some guy says aether exists” based on supposed “common sense and intuition” isn’t enough for me to believe it. Without accepting this assertion, there’s no way that anything else you’re saying makes sense.
Well it seems you just made up a bunch of untestable stuff. It may seem internally consistent (to you at least) but I am pretty sure it’s all crazy talk. I’m sure plenty of genius stuff would sound crazy to me but since you are a complety uncredited random internet poster, I am just gonna file it under crazy. Get back to me when a single guy with Physics background backs you up.
If this were true, the earth’s orbit would be constantly degrading because of friction against the mass of the aether.
The earth’s orbit is not constantly degrading.
Your theory is wrong.
You put it well. 
I’d like to add that could you express yourself with mathematics? Einstein’s papers were always full of formulas, can’t you express your theories the same way?
You appear to not know the meaning of experiment or prediction. Why would dark matter be evenly distributed, if it clumped like ordinary matter?
If the lumpiness is the result of the galaxy moving, there should be an easy to predict distribution of the matter. Does the discovered clumpiness match this? There are many ways it can be lopsided, but only one which supports your hypothesis. If the lopsidedness is not like the wave you should be predicting, then your hypothesis is falsified.
To show you how it is done, I can make a prediction. If you are correct, the distribution of dark matter around any galaxy should be roughly similar, depending on the motion of the galaxy in your supposed aether. Is it?
Your pasting of the same crap over and over and quote mining is not how science works.
Enjoy your ignorance.
File it anyway you want. Enjoy your ignorance.
Already banned, can I call them or what!?
As several science message boards told him already after closing his threads or banning him, (yes, I looked) he should go post his non-scientific semantic points elsewhere.