The Big Empty House

Every day, twice a day, on my commute to and from work, I pass a very large house in a well-off community. It’s the kind of house my wife calls a “McMansion”, because it’s not exactly unique, and appears to be the kind of place the nouveau well-off if not riche buy to celebrate and show off. Except that this one isn’t nestled among a lot of others of its kind. There are some nearby, but not next door. This house stands out because a.) it’s new, b.) it’s got a lot of space around it; and c.) It’s immediate neighbors are much more modest.

The reason that this house keeps my attention is that there’s never anyone there. It’s as if they bought the house merely to say “I can afford a big house”, and kept on living wherever he or she had been living before. The house does gets its walks shoveled and its yard raked of autumn leaves, but that grunt work (along with planting of new trees and the like) is clearly being done by hired labor. Sometimes I see them there, but it’s obviously not the inhabitants (unless the inhabitants have taken to wearing work fatigues with logos on them.) I suspect hired labor puts up the scant Christmas lighting and decorations, too.

Because I never see cars parked there. I never see anyone not a worker in the yard. I never see lights on in one of the not-main rooms. I never see people moving around inside.

Granted, they have a garage that might have the cars in them, but I’m not familiar with anyone who always puts all their cars in the garage. Granted many of the other houses nearby are also pretty anonymous – but I generally see cars parked, or lights on in the upper bedrooms, or individual touches like balloons tied to mailboxes announcing births, or toys left in the yard, or obviously used outdoor furniture. This house continues to grab my attention because it’s so conspicuous, standing out in its large space and with no comparable nearest neighbors, but, for the same reason, I’d notice signs of individual occupancy./ This house looks like a huge purchase that was made for whatever reason, and carefully maintained, but not obviously lived in.

There’s a related phenomenon I’ve noticed examples of – the Ultra-Modern Glass-Sided House plunked down in a sea of Traditional Houses. This is a house of unusual architecture, with many lights on the outside, lots of stonework, and floor-to-ceiling windows on several walls, as if the inhabitants had no need of privacy. These people clearly never walk around in the nude, or have sex in the main room, or even do anything in the slightest non-picturesque, because those window-walled rooms are always aesthetically perfect.

I know of at least two of these nearby, and I’m almost as bothered by them. But in these cases, even though I don’t see people inside them (why not? The walls are all glass!) , I at least see lights in the non-main rooms, and cars parked out front.

I know a couple of houses just like you mention.
I found out the story one. My friend knows the occupant of a large home on an immaculately kept yard. The Lady in this house is an older paraplegic. She has a van that is rarely used and in a garage. I thought the house was empty for many years. It just seemed lonely.
Can’t be the answer for every lonely looking house.
Now that i know about this one house it seems different, some how.

You say

and later,

Isn’t the most likely explanation that the resident(s) have a similar routine to yours - presumably, your house would appear empty if I passed it every day ten minutes after you left for work and ten minutes before you returned home.

There’s an alderman in my area that is in the middle of building this million dollar monstrosity. It might actually be a really nice house, it just looks really out of place surrounded by houses that cost $100,000 owned by people making $50,000.

There was a similar house where I used to live. It was properly maintained, with a huge front yard and the house was set back so far it could barely be seen from the street. I did some investigating and found out the person who owned the house was a single man who apparently went out about 3 a.m. every day to et groceries at the 24 hour store. Other than that, he had not contact with the outside world. No visitors, no friends, nothing.

Any chance it might be a model home? Although those are usually festooned with signage.

Similarly, up the road a bit, there was a river-front plot of marshy land that was purchased with the intent of putting up condos (a small community, probably 6 units). The land was cleared, the road and parking lots were poured, electricity was installed and THE CLUB HOUSE WAS BUILT! Then: POOF! no condo units were built, the construction equipment did a quick fade and the area started reverting to nature. Used cars started showing up for sale in the parking lots. It was more than a few years before construction resumed. Last I saw, they were roofing the units. Then we moved.

That looks like an office building.

I’ve wondered about the wall of windows thing myself. There’s two expensive houses near where I live that have them. One has been there awhile - it’s a ‘chalet’ style and the entire front of the living area is composed of two ginormous angled windows. There’s a new one next door to that house that recently went up and as far as I can tell, no one actually lives there yet. The entire front of that is flat glass panels. My husband says it looks like a liquor store - our ABC bureau has been building new stores lately and they do look very much the same.

There are wealthy people in places like China or Russia who buy homes in desirable locations in the US and the UK, partly as a way of parking money overseas and partly so they can send their children to a good Western school system. There are entire luxury apartment buildings in Manhattan and London that have overseas owners who rarely occupy them. (Personally, I think the cities should discourage this, as it’s better for the economy if the homeowners actually live in the homes, so they’re spending money locally at restaurants, stores and so forth.)

There are plenty of houses like this (though not on the order of McMansions) in a development not far from where I live, that I have dubbed “Neutron Bomb Estates” because I rarely see signs of human existence when running or walking my dog through it, even in optimal weather.

Some people seem to spend virtually all of their time indoors when they’re home.

There are alternate explanations for the OP’s case. It could be that there was a death in the family or divorce, torpedoing plans to move in. Or the place could have been at one time on the market but drew no buyers at the asking price, and the owners can afford to put a hold on selling it until the market improves. Meantime you’ve got to keep up the property, at least externally.

I have gone by at many different hours of the day (I’ve worked a lot of late nights). If they were inhabiting the house, I’d expect to see signs of it outside my normal commuter hours.

In one neighborhood where we lived a few decades ago, someone built a big, quite attractive house on a tiny lot with very little space between the house and the road. It just looked out of place. I guess the house itself was important to them, more than its location.

Similarly, near where I live now, there’s a gorgeous brick house on a decent-sized lot, but it sits right next to a bridge that comprises a big chunk of its view. I can’t understand why one would have a waterfront house with such a limited waterfront view, to say nothing of the road noise and dirt from passing traffic. Each to his own, I guess…

Was the hose or the bridge/road there first? I always lived in cities along the coast of Lake Michigan. As long as there’s something other than sand, people will continue to build closer and closer to the lake. So, what might have been lake front property 100 years ago, now has a road and another row of houses in front of it.

Then, of course, there’s people that aren’t looking for lake front property, people that might not even realize that by building there, they’ll have a harder time selling (or maybe easier, like obstructed view seats). A while back a developer was building some condos on the lake (and thus taking away the lake view from a lot of houses). A friend was walking in the area and heard one of the construction workers say (with a Texas drawl, if it makes a difference) that he didn’t know why anyone would want to live here when all they can see is water.

The bridge is older than the house - we watched the house being built.

<shrug> I own a plot of land I bought at the beginning of August, and it will be sitting empty until we flip and sell the house in western NY, a target date of roughly December 2021. Not in any particular hurry to get out to Nevada though I am really eager to finally manage the move. I am tired of the cold and snowy New England winters, and rainy grey skies. I can deal with snow and cold if I have a lovely sun in a clear blue sky. SAD sucks … and I also want the more stable barometric pressure, and the hot spring for my achy body.

In some places (parts of New England, for example) you can see elaborate houses on small lots, located near the street. Apparently traffic noise was much lower in the pre-horseless carriage era, and/or wealthy people just didn’t care much about owning a lot of land (which tended to be relatively cheap in olden days).

Today, you can find entire subdivisions like the house mentioned in the OP. Folks have to look further and further out from their jobs to find affordable housing. This means hellacious commutes.

A “for instance”: the High Desert area of Southern California. Victorville, Phelan, Apple Valley these towns have been booming. People working in LA or Orange County are enticed by the low home prices (compared to LA or Orange County), and they grudginly accept the commute. That means getting up at Oh-Gawd-thirty, and driving home long after dark.
~VOW

They also wanted their neighbours to know how well off they were. An elaborate house close to the street is a very visible symbol of wealth (or was, then).

It could be an estate situation: someone died and it is taking a long time to settle the estate. Or perhaps the owners are in a nursing home.

as someone who lives in the area you forgot palmdale and lancaster(the biggest city in the area (santa claritia dosent count as its over the mountain )

Unfortuamtly in the past few years weve been getting the dregs of la and orange county …we would like them to be reclaimed …

Maybe a dumb question, but are the lights ever on?

And don’t realtors always say it’s best not to be the most expensive or least expensive house in the neighborhood?