Well, I said I wouldn’t dare speak French in Calgary (unless I’m sure my interlocutor is francophone), which is true. That’s what I did when I actually was there in 2006. To me Calgary is deep in your part of Canada, so not a place for French. Even in Ottawa I rarely speak French with someone I don’t know, unless I’m sure it’s their first language.
In New Brunswick (an officially bilingual province) I usually speak French when I’m in a francophone city, and English when I’m in an anglophone city. It just makes sense. It gets complicated with bilingual cities like Moncton, but I tend to default to English out of the perception that anglophones might not speak French, or want to hear it even if they do speak it, while francophones (especially outside Quebec) just don’t care. And bilingual cities like Moncton and Ottawa are usually more English than French anyway, since they attract people from the rest of the (mostly English-speaking) province, so I’m putting luck on my side.
In Quebec though, even in Montreal, I default to French unless my interlocutor clearly doesn’t speak it. In Pontiac I’d probably feel shy going with French first, but then force me to do it as a matter of principle. So that’s my policy regarding language borders, in Canada at least.
I am aware that a number of young Quebecers are moving to Alberta because of the economic strength over there. But does it translate to more public servants who can actually serve the public in both languages? I’m not sure, and as I’ve said it’s definitely not something that I expect, despite Canada being a bilingual country and everything.
Hey, if we separate we’ll lose the Rockies! 
Nevertheless, Cat Whisperer brings out an important point. All parts of Canada contribute something to Canadian identity. But what Quebec brings is largely something you don’t care about. That’s not “bad” or wrong. But given this, can we really claim to be one country or one nation?
One. The 2007 election led to a minority government, replaced in 2008 by the current majority government. Next election to be held, I suppose, in late 2012 or early 2013. Still enough time for Charest to resign and let his successor build up some achievements to show for the next election.
Of course, but let’s not disregard the need for leaders. A good leader can inspire his country to do great things. I’m sure Quebec’s history would be different if René Lévesque had stayed in broadcasting, or joined Trudeau’s government, or been killed during World War II.
Well I can tell you what my main issue with English Canada is, and it doesn’t have anything to do with recognition or money or anything of the sort, just perception and attitude. English Canadians know next to nothing about Quebec, which I have no problem with (I know little about most foreign countries either), but constantly act with the utmost arrogance, as if they knew everything, and knew that of course we have a problem which they know how to solve. If you check what you people say about us, it’s always about how racist and xenophobic we are, we supposedly hate Jews, Muslims, blacks, Latinos, Asians and everybody who isn’t pure laine (a phrase I’ve almost never heard in French, only in English), or how mercenary we are, or how dishonest (elbows basically just called us a nation of thieves; I remember another thread where we’ve been called a nation of strip club owners but that was more of a joke and I guess at least it’s an honest trade). There’s never any sense that when Quebec and the rest of Canada differ on any issue, it may be because we’re two different peoples whose culture, fears, hot-button issues are largely similar, but may differ even on some important points. It’s always that Quebec is WRONG!, probably because its little people is being lied to and controlled by demagogic separatist politicians, so good English Canada must intervene.
Add to this the complete lack of awareness about themselves that English Canadians sometimes show. Yes, English Canadians are a proud people, almost a people of flag-wavers despite the fact that they claim to just be “nice” and understated and that all this overt patriotism is “American :rolleyes:”. There isn’t anything wrong with that, but by God just recognize it! And this multiculturalism which you’re so proud of is really nothing special. It doesn’t make you automatically not racist; neither does the French on your cereal boxes and the fact that you claim to be bilingual. You’re not less racist than us (not more either), if there was a means to measure that. I mean, English Canada is the country where, when there are debates about making some cities officially bilingual, you have these little old men go to Town Hall in their military uniform saying that they didn’t fight for the country to now surrender to the French.
Yes, I know it’s always hard to see our own defects, while seeing them in other people is pretty easy. Yes, we Quebecers do that as well: I can point out English Canada’s defects, but I’d have more difficulty pointing out ours. But the main difference is this: English Canadians consider Quebec, as part of their own country, something they should have influence on. So they look at us, filter what they see through their own prejudices and their ignorance, and then tell us what we are and what we should be. They tell us in English, so of course this is what Americans know about us (how many Americans think there are currently separatist terrorist groups active in Quebec?), and it filters out to other countries as well. Quebecers don’t think they have any standing to tell the rest of Canada what to do. I can say that Albertans are redneck Creationist brutes who think they’ve got a God-given right to destroy the planet (note: I don’t actually believe this), and who cares? As I’ve said earlier, Alberta is in your part of the country, so it’s none of our business, and the more nationalist the Quebecer, the more he believes that. (Well, except for the “destroy the planet” part, which affects us all.)
So there’s that, to start with.