The Penile Lengthening Column got too long so I had to cut it short. 
(Sorry, it’s hard to resist). It wasn’t showing new posts properly. Here’s the last post if anyone wants to continue (and what do I have to give you to make you decline?):
Posted by BunnyGirl:
That’s the problem, O Great and Wise Moderator, Sir. You can’t simply restore these things once they get cut short!
I know… Can the cutting humor. But for once I’m feeling sharp!
Just don’t be foreskin us to stop debating this!
It may seem silly at first but it’s the kind of thing that’ll grow on ya.
Hey, any foreskin of Jack Dean Tyler’s is a frenum mine!
Esprix
Obviously you all have been cut. That kind of sarcastic and attack-oriented humor would never come from an intact male.
Please stop bringing irrelevant, argumentative evidence into this debate. These medical studies are obviously propaganda, similar to the advertisements a decade ago to make Americans happy with their American-made automobiles after they bought them. Doctors don’t really care about your penises, they are only justifying their millions of amputations over the years. To admit that they were wrong would open them up to numerous costly law suits.
Let’s summarize the facts, as have been evidenced in aforementioned posts and sites:
Some women, in this thread, have claimed to have been with both cut and uncut men and have not noticed an obvious difference in the sexual intensity. It is quite probable that these women were in a drug or alcohol induced state as they did not realize the obvious, that the sex was much better. On the other hand, many of them have probably cut, or planned to cut their own sons and are thus justifying the irreparable harm done to their children.
In addition to the superior sexual abilities of uncut men, there is a superior orgasm and pleasure in an uncut penis. The inside half of the foreskin (7.5 sq inches) is not really skin, but a membrane full of nerves that enable uncut men to have superior orgasms. While the sensitivity and pleasure derived from this skin and these nerve endings has been disputed in this thread by uncut men, they are simply wrong and don’t understand the appropriate way to utilize their penises. It is such a waste. Here are men who have the much idolized but forever lost foreskin, and they are incapable of fully enjoying it due to their ignorance in coitus.
While the penis is usually confined in garments of some type, with obvious exceptions of public showers, nude beaches and orgies, just knowing that one has been cut is a significant mental embarassment. Because of this medically caused deformity, all circumsized men are destined to live out their lives as freaks in comparison to the rest of the (well under 50%) properly uncircumsized males in the United States. To correct this embarassing, sexually limiting condition, a device called Tug-ahoy was developed to pull the cut skin back to it’s former aestetic, if not operational, glory.
The affects of circumcision cut much deeper than sexual performance. The early snip causes a physical trauma that often translates into a mental trauma. This single act has been found to cause agressive behavior in the recipients later in life. It leads to ‘Foreskin Envy’, a derivative of Penis Envy suffered by females. However, since men are more agressive by nature, they manifest this envy through violent behavior. Most mass-murderers were cut at birth. It is merely coincidence that most men were cut at birth in the United States.
The opposition argues that uncircumsized penises can cause penile and cervical cancer. These cancers were developed by the medical profession in laboratories and inflicted upon uncircumsized males and their partners in a secret conspiracy to provide evidence contrary to the devastating effects of circumcision. Due to the general acceptance of routine cutting by the medical industry, they cover each other with peer reviews to protect themselves from the tremendous lawsuits that would ensue if the truth about foreskins were communicated to the masses.
In summation, only the ignorant or sadistic will have their sons cut. This grass roots effort will take root now and be echoed throughout the United States. We only hope that this message is carried appropriately to Save Our Foreskins Throughout America… SOFT America.
Jack . . . Jack, jack, jack.
This past June I took a philosophy course in which, among other things, we discussed the . . . rules and such, I guess . . . of logic. That class raised my GPA about 3/10 of a point. Draw from that as you wish.
As my father was telling me today, the way a scientist goes about proving something is by either actually doing so (which you’ve said is impossible) or by proving that all the other options aren’t possible. Now, I would hope it’s glaringly obvious that in my case, not circumsizing me was not an option. My foreskin was swollen shut; we had a pediatrician and pediatric urologist work on it; they couldn’t do anything. I literally couldn’t pee. So I had the operation.
If you care to disagree with that . . . you need to go back to your own community college, or a library, or ask a grade school science teacher how to argue a case where you have no reasonable argument to make.
As for the whole ignorance bit . . . Jack, with a nurse for a father and two relatives who are doctors (not to mention my biology teacher was a physical therapist) . . . there are some things in medicine in which I do exhibit ignorance. This, Jack, is not one of them.
As for the whole “stupidity is ignorance by choice” . . . I’m going to give you an early Christmas present and not thrash that statement. I am fairly sure others will if they don’t have the same compassion for lost souls I’ve learned.
In the spirit of this thread, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours. In other words, lets hear what your educational and professional credentials are, Jack, and then I’ll be happy to tell you about mine. Unless or until you are ready to do so, I suggest you refrain from maligning the educations of others.
Such as . . . ? News flash, Jack: “You’re wrong because I say so” is itself a “glaring theorectical mistake” and an obvious non-starter in the field of logic. If you allege I have made “glaring theoretical mistakes,” then it is up to you to point them out and attack them. Do not expect me (or anyone) to take just your word for it; I, for one, would not rely on your word alone for the premise that the sun will rise tomorrow.
Wanna bet?
Sometimes a statement is so perfectly ironic and amusing that the best you can do is to refrain from comment and just leave it to shine in all its unintended glory.
Don’t you mean phallacy?
JustAnotherGuy, yer the tops. 
One thing, though - you forgot the whole Jewish/medical conspiracy angle. How could you have forgotten such an important part of the Illuminati cover-up? Really!
Esprix
I had no interest at all in this thread until today. Last night, the topic of circumcision came up in my house. My husband, an Asian (uncircumcised, of course) who has only been in the U.S. for about 5 months, had never heard of it.
Imagine the look on the face of a grown man hearing about this procedure for the first time. It was priceless.
If we ever have any sons, BTW, they will be left intact.
Has this thing set a record for the longest dick thread yet?
Your sig and this thread definetly do not mix…
something about “Why do I always get the warped one?”
I’ll bet Jack could tell me why…
It’s been a little over a day since Jack Dean Tyler’s last post.
Does this guy post in dumps (no pun intended) or has he decided that we are also part of the circumcision conspiracy? Or do we all know nothing of the science of logic?
I find it particularly amusing that JDT seems to think Jodi needs to brush up on her logic . . .
JDT, you keep saying “David B will back me up on this one”. Maybe it’s just me, but I haven’t seen David B back you up once yet. Is he also part of the conspiracy?
perhaps…but you mean “longest dick” thread or
longest “dick thread” 
Saint Zero said to Gaudere:
(Emphasis added.)
Hmmmm. Looks like somebody’s pulling a Libertarian.
Or else Gaudere got really cut!
Now can we ban him for being insulting? Huh, huh?
No, no, no. He’s the tips.
[Moderator Hat ON]
Sorry, no dice. “You need to take an intro to logic course” is not considered a direct personal insult in the same manner that “you are a moron” is. Hell, I’ve told people they need to study [insert field of study of choice] in GD threads plenty of times. Sometimes it is quite valid to tell someone they need to study a subject more, like when the creationists post about how stupid evolution is when they clearly don’t know the first thing about it. Not that I consider JDT’s comments in any way valid in this case.
And would you guys quit arguing about moderating procedure in GD threads, please? It distracts from the actual debate and it’s far better served by an email to David and me. We’ll look at any post you email us about and take the action we decide is necessary (though sometimes that’ll be nothing, but we will explain our reasoning). If you feel you need to post about a moderating decision publically, post in the BBQ Pit (but you should probably email us about the post in question before you run to the Pit, because I’d rather not get ranted at for not censoring someone for a post I might not have even noticed). 'Kay?
[Moderator Hat OFF]