The Comics Industry is Dying (or, They're an Art Form, Dammit!)

Plus (unless publishers deal differently with bookstores and newstands than they do with comic shops), comics are non-returnable. When a store buys a certain number of comics, that’s it, the store has to sell them, or they eat the cost. Since comics are periodicals, they have a certain time they can sit on the shelf before they have to come off to make room for the new issue. Then what do you do with all those copies of Super Codpiece Blaster Squad you didn’t sell last month? As I understand it, unsold magazines go back to the publisher (the publisher assumes the risk). Unsold comics either accumulate sadly on the shelf, or go in the trash (the retailer assumes the risk).

Which is why trade paperbacks and original graphic novels are attractive. They’re book-sized; they’re supposed to accumulate on the shelf, so Barnes and Noble (for instance) is far more willing to stock them.

I am. If I were a pro in the comics industry, I would be lobbying for it every day. Except for one thing: Not “no consideration for continuity” but stories that can stand without it. Too many comics only sell because of continuity. Nothing worthwhile happens in a single issue, and no new reader will start from a single issue. It’s self-destructive.

Defeatists!

It IS possible to market comics more widely. It’s been done before. Like I said, when I was a kid, there was a comic rack in virtually every convenience store, every drug store, every supermarket, some department stores, some bookstores, every newsstand.

Why did that change?

Comics got too expensive for kids.

Storylines got too convoluted to hold a kid’s short attention span.

How do you solve the problem? Make comics more cheaply. Make comics with simple story lines that appeal to kids. Sell some funny animal-type comics to hook the youngest readers.

(My eight-year-old niece LOVES beat-up old Hot Stuff and Richie Rich comics I give her. She’d buy new ones if they were cheap and readily-available. Hint: she would not buy issue 5 of an 8-issue story arc of Captain-Grim-Realism-Comics at $2.50 a pop. Adult-oriented comics are fine, but if that’s all you have, you’ve signed the death warrant for the industry.)

Is that true? I know it certainly was NOT true in days past. Sellers could cut off the covers of unsold comics and get refunds. (I know this because as a kid, I would sometimes go behind the drug store and pull unsold comics out of the trash bins. They’d have the top half of the front cover cut off, but hey, they were still readable.)

If publishers are not issuing refunds these days, they’re cutting their own throats.

Correction: comic COLLECTORS turn their noses up at the tiniest crease or imperfection. If comics are selling only to collectors and not to casual readers, the comics industry is doing something wrong. I read my comics until they were ragged when I was a kid.

Also, comics used to be monthly, or bi-monthly for popular titles, but not weekly. Has that changed?

And that reflects a failure of the industry to produce comics that will sell to casual readers (i.e. KIDS) and not just collectors. IMHO.

Depends on what you call the heyday, I suppose, but comics used to sell in huge numbers (as Krokodil pointed out). By the early 90’s, the comic book shops were becoming the main marketing arm, and sales figures were lower. (I hate to keep trotting out “when I was a kid,” but…) When I was a kid most stores had a comics rack near the register. Moms would buy The Enquirer on impulse, and their kids would grab a Spider-Man. It could happen that way again with the right marketing plan, the right pricing, and the right product.

NOTE TO COMICS INDUSTRY: Market to kids, or resign yourself to niche-market status.

Not true, Cal. Since it became a magazine, Mad has often had long articles with nothing but text except for diagrams or even less.

Great post,'Legomancer

Or, we could at the monthly level, have anthologies that are not necessarily TPB size, but monthly-magazine-sized, where you could have a variety of contents – multiple long and short freestanding stories AND continuing-series chapters in the same issue; action, mystery, humor and SF in the same issue; or both. At a reasonable monthly-magazine price, achieved through lighter paper and more economical printing.

Of course, there will be comics snobs who will turn up their noses at anything that creases or that is not immediately mylared in mint condition. These are people who need to Get Over It. One main thing that makes classic old comics, baseball cards, stamps, coins, cars, WW2 planes, etc. so valuable is that they survived when they were EXPECTED to be consumed, passed around and eventually discarded, destroyed or re-smelted. And besides their mothers will STILL throw out the collection if she needs the closet space, regardless that it includes a whole box of the Special Edition vinyl-bound landscape-printed 3-Part series where the guy had sex with the chicken .

Have a manageable number of these anthologies published at the same time, with some being general-interest, others “targeted” by theme or by age/gender demographic – who knows, there may be a solid market for Bad Girl Tit Illustrated Monthly – and have some character or comic appear in multiple anthologies (not necessarily all: create some overlap and maybe skip a month now and then) as “bridge” or “crossover” bait. (I’d nominate “Look Out For Panty Girl” in that role, but that’s just me :smiley: )

It all boils down to one thing: the industry today is geared to the fanboys instead of general readers. Fandom has its place, but it’s ruining the comic book industry.

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating. Playing to the fans is a losing proposition because they almost never have the source material’s (book, comic, movie, tv show) best interests at heart.

As a long-time MAD reader,. I disagree. I’ve never seen a text-only article in Mad. There’s alwaysa large illustration, even if only a framing device. And even these are rare – Mad is and always has been primarily a “comic” magazine, and always a visual one.

How long is “long-time”, Cal? I have the complete Mad up to 1998 on CD.

The practice may have fallen into disuse since the 60’s - I haven’t read the whole thing yet - but back then they were presenting items as magazine articles would be; columns accentuated by photographs. There’s one in a hard-copy anthology from 1963 (“The Modern Teacher” in Good ‘n’ Mad) which has numerous pages containing nothing but text.

Yes, Mad has always primarily told its jokes via strips and large illustrations (e.g. the Mad Primers), but the article-style sections have not “always been virtually non-existent”.

Been reading since the 1960s. I stand by my statement. Even when something seemed to be all text, they’d surround it with a “frame” by Paul Coker or George Woodbridge or something.
At the vey least they would “draw” the text onto fake notebook pages or manuscript, or something. And, again, such pieces were by far the exception.

Again, I’ve NEVER seen a pure-text “article” in Mad. Look in your collection again.

First, I wanna say thanks to Ike for fixing the thread title for me. If you were a female and attractive I’d ask you to bare my children.

Some people asked some questions about current comics market sales practices that weren’t answered so I’ll give a couple of quick responses to them, and then I’m going to expound on the direct market and the effects it has had upon the industry, and then I’m going to list what I think should be done to fix the current state of the industry. I know some people already know most of this stuff but this is for the people who don’t.

Comics come out on a weekly basis, however that’s just how the publishers have planned the distribution of their titles, most of the individual titles themselves come out on a monthly basis; in other words Spider-Man comes out this week, The Hulk next week and people are running to the comics store on a weekly basis for different comics. There have been a few comics that went weekly for periods of time, Action Comics did in the eighties I believe, but that’s unusual.

As for returning unsold comics to the publisher, that depends on who they are sold to and what arrangement the publisher has with them. In the late seventies the direct market was formed, separate from the traditional mainstream stores that sold comics. The key difference that led to the formation and explosion of the direct market was that the direct market buyer could order whatever he wanted from the publisher, whereas the mainstream sellers took whatever was handed to them; this enabled the comics reader to be able to go to one place (a direct market shop) and pick up whatever he desired instead of running all over town looking for Captain Carrot #54. The direct market pays a lesser dollar amount for the comics than mainstream retailers, therefore garnering higher profits on individual comics sold, with the catch that unlike mainstream retailers those books purchased from the publisher are unreturnable and that’s why any comic shop you go into will have a bin of comics being sold for a quarter when their cover price is $2. So the short answer to the question is the returnablity of comics depends on who ordered them.*

The formation of the direct market has been a boon to comics’ content and a bane to comics industry sales.

The direct market has allowed the telling of longer multiple-issue stories with greater complexity within the comics by giving the readers someplace they could go and be sure to pick up the next issue, whereas before the direct market was formed it was hit or miss whether or not the reader could get his hands on the next issue in the series thus limiting the length of the story. After the direct market appeared epics told within the confines of a single comics series became commonplace (does anyone really think there’s no direct relationship between the popularity of Chris Claremont’s character driven X-Men in the late seventies-early eighties and the fact that it coincided with the rise of the direct market?).

It also allowed the publishers to put out material that wouldn’t fit on supermarket spinner racks, such as more adult oriented comics or single issue comics that greatly exceeded the 22 page format the majority of comics have, hence the sharp rise in graphic novel comics and self-contained stories and experimentation that they can provide.

Another benefit of the direct market was that it allowed greater accessibility to independent comics, because comics shop owners would usually order at least a handful of them, thus giving comics readers easier access to comics that would never have been sold in spinner racks.

The three factors above have done wonders for the complexity of stories told within the medium, thereby helping comics gain a bit of respectability (although far from enough), but this is still far outweighed by the negative stigmatism attached to what is primarily a one genre driven industry. They also caused an initial surge in comics publishers’ profits because they allowed comics fans to be able to purchase more comics that interested them than ever before. Ultimately though, the way the direct market has been run has wound up making it a self-defeating proposition for comics publishers, retailers and, by extension, potential readers.

As was already pointed out by numerous other posters the comics industry caters to the fanboy and that is a large reason for its decline in sales. Direct Market shops started placing orders based upon what sold the most, which unfortunately happened to be what the fanboys of the time wanted: super-heroes. Although super-heroes had risen back into prominence within the industry by the time of the formation of the direct market there were still plenty of other genres available; however by the direct market concentrating primarily on that one genre the majority of other material faded away, which in turn has alienated anyone who was interested in non-super-hero comics. The comics shop owner has inadvertently doomed himself and the industry to lower sales.

The rise of the direct market has also largely pushed comic books out of most other markets. Anyone who is old enough and has been in a supermarket or convenience store has noticed the disappearance of the spinner rack. This is largely due to comics fans no longer buying comics from anywhere but specialty shops, and as been pointed out above, comics fans turning their noses up at the slightest imperfections of a book, something guaranteed to happen on a spinner rack. Although bookstores have started to have a section for graphic novels they are usually ill-kept with little thought given to organization, filled with super-hero titles and also usually buried somewhere in the back of the store. This means that when someone goes into a bookstore they are unlikely to stumble upon any of the graphic novels it carries, and even if they do they will likely show disdainful disregard for what is frequently just a bunch of super-hero books jumbled together.

I have several ideas on what could be done to fix the industry, and it involves efforts on the part of comics retailers and publishers, and a few small sacrifices from comics readers, to make them happen.

Like everyone’s suggested, the return of spinner racks to supermarkets is a good idea. However instead of having them be the primary selling point of comics it should only be used as a jumping off point for potential new readers. The comics sold in spinner racks should keep the smaller page format, although perhaps jumping back up to a sixty-four page size with an anthology format inside (good idea JRDelirious), with the stories contained within being of no more complexity than what you would find in your average prime time TV show, but being from a variety of genres to show that comics has more to offer than just super-heroes (I’m only suggesting single issue comics and anthologies be put in supermarket type settings, they should not be the industry standard, graphic novels should). It would help hook young people into the market and might snag a few adults as well. Also it would be a good idea for comics publishers to include non-comics specialty shops in their next free-comics-day and include more non-super-hero books in what is given away. But spinner racks (or whatever variation of them) and free comics giveaways won’t be a cure-all for the industry and instead there needs to be a focus on the comic book’s primary outlets as well.

Direct market shops need to reshape themselves and change their self-presentation. They need to increase the variety of comics they carry so as to appeal to non-super-hero readers. They also need to lose most of the toys and other clutter, because that turns off non-fanboys when they enter the store and reinforces the image that comics are for kids or geeks; at the very least they need to put that stuff in the back of the shop. I’m not saying that the toys and assorted knick-knacks are for kids, I’ve bought some of that stuff myself, I’m saying that it projects a negative image to potential readers about comics and its readers.

They also need to move the graphic novels from the back of the store to the front (the fanboy will trek the extra twenty feet to get his single issue fix) and stop arranging them by publisher and instead focus on genre like traditional bookstores do. This means a potential reader can skip over super-heroes, if that is his desire, and browse through the dramas or thrillers or whatever his interest is without hunting all over the store. It would also help to have the graphic novels placed with their bindings facing out, instead of the current practice of displaying their covers, because that would help associate comic books more with traditional books and hopefully improve their image (and I know that I pointed out that comics are their own art form and are different from normal books, but the most important thing right now is getting people reading comics, there can be work done on distinguishing the mediums later).

I don’t think there needs to be an emphasis on selling comic books primarily out of traditional bookstores, although I could see how that could easily come about, and as long as bookstores change their placement habits with regards to comics I wouldn’t have a problem with that. I think the direct market can do it on its own however, and each, the bookstore and the comics store, can focus on their own specialties with some cross marketing of books and comic books being fine. However, within the bookstores there should be a push from comics publishers to get them to move the comics towards the front of the store, instead of the dark corner they’re usually in, and have them be organized along the lines I listed for comics direct market retailers. The current arrangement in bookstores is revolting.

As for the publishers, they need to put more original, non-super-hero genre, graphic novels out. I’ve said it multiple times, but lack of variety is a large reason for the oncoming death of the industry. They also need to remove the emphasis of targeting children as new readers because that helps the impression of comics being for kids that most people have. They can still target children, but they should emphasize targeting another group: specifically they need to target mainstream teenagers, because if you can get the proverbial varsity football player to start openly reading comics the rest of the youth culture will follow. Targeting teenagers is also a good idea because most teenagers consider their pursuits to be grown-up and will likely carry the reading of comics into adult hood where they can pass it on to their children. In other words Marvel and DC need to stop targeting Sesame Street and start targeting MTV.

These are all of course my own suggestions, and I’m sure some people will disagree with them, and who knows, if implemented they could all fail, and that’s assuming that they are implementable, because it is easy to talk about performing these ideas but execution is far more difficult. But the comic industry is dying and something needs to be done relatively soon to save it.

-I need to make a quick correction to my OP. According to a website on the history of super-heroes (which is currently down, otherwise I’d link to it) comics did not go to a largely original material format until the nineteen-thirties, not around the turn of the century like I claimed, and instead primarily published collected comic strips for most of its early years. I see this as having little effect upon my argument that comics can contain non-super-hero material and thrive because comics did still exist for forty years before super-heroes hit the scene, they carried a greater variety of genres before the rise of the direct market, and during the late forties to fifties super-hero comics were dead (with the exception of DC’s big three, Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman) with other genres ruling the market.

*I called my local comics shop to make sure that direct retailers could still not return comics and he told me that in very rare circumstances they can. For instance, say a book is six months late in coming out, the interest in it may have declined at no fault to the retailer. In a situation like that the retailer may return the book because its lateness has in effect rendered it unsellable. However, as a general rule it is safe to say that direct market retailers cannot return comic books, but nearly anyone else can.

See, every time this argument comes up, someone always posts a list of books that aren’t about spandex clad heroes that are really exellent books that reach outside the box, and all of the books on their list are either low print run indy books, mini-series, or both.

Is their room for the comics industry to grow? Yes. Can their be books about things other that heroes? Again, yes.

Ways to get in new readers? Well, abandoning continuity is not one of them. In fact, ask anyone who read Byrne’s “Spider-man Chapter One” and see how much they liked the idea of forgetting continuity. Have shorter stories that are wrapped up in 22 pages? Not going to fly either, as I for one wouldn’t want to read simple drivel for my 3 bucks. Broaden the industry away from the superhero books? There are plenty of gread titles that are 100% spandex free, but where do they rank in the sales? Take a look here http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=1763 and see how many aren’t about giant robots or spandex-y heroes. Why would Iron Man outrank Cerebus by over a hundred ranks every month.

Why the hell would Marvel put out a romantic comedy book? They’re not concerned about creating a critically acclaimed, but low selling book. The more items sold, the more money made. Bottom line.

The highest sales in the past 20 years in comics were made in the hero genre. I would guess that the in the top 50 best selling issues in the past 20 years, 49 are super hero comics. Why would you try and publish something that’s not even going to stand a chance to get there?

Plus, all of these great, non-super hero books that everyone is recommending as examples on books that appeal to a wider audiance, I say that’s full of crap, because they don’t appeal to a wider audiance, they appeal to the readership of hero comics, because that is the readership that buy comics.

As good as “Whiteout” was, it was not advertised in Vogue or Sports Illustrated, but rather in Wizard. Why? Comics appeal to comics fans.

**

Comics are 2 and a quarter now, compared to the buck they used to be in what, 1987? That was 16 years ago. I will argue that most monthly publications hace seem similar rises in price since then.

Storylines got too convoluted for kids to follow? I read Dark Phoenix when I was 10. That was like a 10 part story arc. I got Kraven’s last Hunt in grade 5, which was a 6 issues crossover. Stories have to be interesting, because no one, not even kids want midless reading. Maybe a few notches less mature themed, but not mindless.

Speaking as a European, I’ve never understood why no one has tried to bring comics like Tintin, Asterix, Carl Barks’ old Donald Duck comics (hell, it IS an American comic! It should be more popular over there!) or Spirou to a broader American market. Over here, those are the kind of comics most people think of when you say the word “comic books”.

Now, I haven’t read many real superhero comics, but what I’ve read has mostle seemed a bit too much targeted at hormonal twelve-year olds. A bit too many big-chested girls in spandex and “BIFF! BANG! POW!” for parents to want to read it out loud for their five-year old kids, I mean. :smiley:

So, anyway, I think a lot of these “European” comics are more well-crafted and show a bit more respect for their audience’s critical thinking ability, sort of like a well-done Disney movie. I think it could help if those kinds of comics became popular too, to counter the image most adults have of comics as ONLY superhero comics and ONLY year-long story arcs that only devoted fans can keep track of.

Oh, and maybe the European comic market could use more superheroes, to have something for the hormonal twelve-year olds who’ve decided that they’re “too mature” for Tintin. :smiley:

sorry if I offended fans of superhero comics <grin>

Why do you assume that shorter = drivel? Most of Alan Moore’s best stuff would easily fit in 22 pages. Many of the issues of Sandman that people remember were single issues. Hell, the story that featured the first appearance of Galactus was what, 2 issues? Three?

The industry needs to get away from the idea that bigger = better. I loved James Robinson’s Starman, but some of the stories towards the end went on far too long and were way padded out. I’d rather get 22 pages of a good story than 12 issues where not a lot happens.

** Scott, ** comic sales are declining steadily. Sales may spike now and then, but undeniably the overall trend is downward. Sooner or later, one way or another, comics publishers are going to have to find some way to reach a wider audience than the fan boys. If they fail–or worse yet, make no serious effort to do so–then the comics industry will be locked into a downward spiral, and comics may one day be as rare as popular fiction magazines today.

Nobody said that ** no ** comic should ever have continuity or complex plots. The hard core fans seem to like that, and though I often feel exasperated with the fan boys they have a place (and an important one) in the comics scene. But if the publishers want to reach potential new readers, they’re going to have to publish at least some comics with self-contained stories, branch out beyond the superhero genre, and make a serious effort to market comics through outlets other than comics shops. Not many new readers will be encouraged to continue reading a title if they pick up an issue and realize they’re going to have to spend $10 or $15 and read five or six more comics just to get up to speed. Add to that the difficulty of having to go out of their way simply to find comics in the first place, and I’d say you’ve eliminated 99% of any potential new readers who may be out there.

If you consider this unworkable or undesirable, please explain how you think the comics industry can reverse this long term downward trend.

I think it’s worth noting that this list comprises exclusively Diamond-distributed books, which means it reflects the direct market, and only the direct market. It doesn’t tell us how many Powerpuff Girls, Dragonball Z, or Yu-Gi-Oh comics (is there even a Yu-Gi-Oh comic? I have to assume there is) are being sold at bookstores and newsstands to little kids who couldn’t possibly care less who Ben Reilly is.

This is not to say that, if only we could arrange things properly, Finder would be selling six million copies per month. It would probably never sell that much, no matter how ridiculously excellent I think it is (something like Hopeless Savages, on the other hand, I think could be selling truckloads if only we could arrange things properly). However, merely pointing to the direct market as it exists, and saying, “Thus it is, thus shall it ever be, embrace the spandex,” is no more realistic, in my opinion, than maintaining that the fanboy/direct-market Axis of Mediocrity is the only thing keeping the latest issue of Fantagraphics’ I Can’t Talk To Girls! or whatever from breaking sales records.

P.S.- Asylum, thanks for the more detailed explanation on returnability.

Why bother to buy comix when I can just read through the collections at Borders and B&N? Maybe not a huge factor, but still…

The type of books you mention are marketed towards current comics readers, the majority of whom are more concerned with super-hero comics than any other genre. You then point at the low print runs of these books as proof of non-super-hero books being incapable of larger sales completely ignoring that the current marketing practices surrounding them would be the equivalent of advertising a Ronald Reagan biography on BET: the majority of that audience is not concerned with that type of material regardless of how good it is.

The problem is that most people don’t know that non-super-hero comics exist except for fanboys and the few odd comics aficionados who actively seek out non-super-hero stuff. What many of us are trying to say is that if the comics publishers start pushing non-fantasy material to a wider audience then that will draw more people into the industry and in the long term that will equal higher sales and profits.

**

Scott, I honestly wonder if you even bothered to read my posts. I never said anything about abandoning continuity, at least with regards to books where that may be part of their appeal. But if comics are to expand beyond their current audience then there must be some breaks with the mainstream tradition, and that means more self-contained stories.

As for why Iron Man outsells Cerebus that is again due to the comics market being dominated by super-hero fans as opposed to fans of other genres. If the comics industry manages to break into a larger and more varied audience Iron Man may in fact still outsell Cerebus, but I’ll bet you dollars to donuts that some non-super-hero book would outsell Iron Man.

**

Marvel is concerned with putting out books that sell, and if they put out a romantic comedy book of sufficient quality and marketed towards the proper demographic, at least in the long run it could indeed sell. Why couldn’t it?

**

The highest sales in the comics industry in the last twenty years have indeed been on super-hero books because that is primarily all that has existed and it is super-hero books that have received the lion’s share of the marketing. If the comics publishers started publishing a wider variety of material and marketed it as strongly as they did the Death of Superman non-fanboys would come looking for it, and if the material is good enough people will stick around.

Take a look at Marvel’s 9-11 book: non-comics fans came into comics shops actively looking for it due to the heavy advertising it got. Admittedly this was primarily free advertising on talk shows and in newspaper articles, but it was a product with a broader public appeal than your average super-hero comic, it received a large amount of advertising, and therefore large sales.

You’re also guilty of the “is-ought” fallacy in the paragraph quoted above (and it runs throughout your entire argument), but I’ll get into that later.**

No, Whiteout was not advertised in Vogue or Sports Illustrated because it was assumed that it would appeal only to comics fans. If Oni had advertised in Vogue or Sports Illustrated then people who had never set foot in a comics store would have been showing up in direct market shops looking for it.

Moreover, they didn’t take out ads in Vogue because they knew that the cost would have offset any additional revenue they would have received from such advertising. Before you start jumping up and down shouting “I told you so”, the important thing to realize is that it won’t be one book advertised in a few mainstream magazines that will start a revolution in the comics industry. It will take many books in many magazines to get the ball rolling. In other words the comics industry needs to make a few short term sacrifices for long term gain.

Think about it in these terms: Whiteout is currently optioned to be made into a movie, and this is based on the story that was told within the comic. What would make this story so appealing to the mainstream in only one form, but not another (and before you answer this or mention super-hero movies again, please go and read my last two posts and OP)?

**

No, they haven’t. Using a handy example I’m sure you’re at least remotely familiar with, Wizard has 168 pages for 5.99, or .035 a page. Your average comic goes for $.102 a page (using your 2 and a quarter figure). So if Wizard had the same cost per page that comics do it’d be going for $17 or so.

Comics can get away a higher page cost if they have a number of pages roughly equivalent to Wizard, assuming that the story is self-contained, or at least if the majority of the plot threads are begun and wrapped up within said book (with an exception for those books that would have diehard followers, rabid about continuity).

The comics industry needs to go to graphic novels, or at bare minimum lower prices, if they want to attract new readers.

**

You had no problem following those stories because you picked up every issue month after month and were therefore familiar with the characters and the current plotlines. If you had started reading the Dark Phoenix Saga with X-Men #132 you would have been confused coming in halfway through the story, and that is how most people are going to feel picking up your average issue of your average comic series.

Also you seem to be arguing that if a story isn’t multi-issue it won’t be interesting. I won’t even bother to come up with examples that prove that wrong, I’m sure you can think of plenty yourself.

Scott, why don’t you do this if you are so sure you are right: come up with an explanation for why comics will not sell unless super-heroes are in them. So far you have listed examples that might be used in support of such an argument, but you have not forwarded such an argument. All you have done is say “Well, non-super-hero books don’t sell now, so they won’t sell ever”, and the problem with that line of logic is that it involves the “is-ought” fallacy: “This is the way things are, so things ought to be this way”; this completely skips over why things are a certain way and does not examine cause, or if indeed the current situation is the only way things can (or ought) to be.

I loved Tintin and Asterix growing up! I actually still have most of those comics and occasionally I’ll pull them out to reread them.

Tintin stories aren’t as enjoyable to me as an adult, but the artwork is still incredible. Asterix I’ll still pick up on occasion because I enjoy the humor and innocent stories and think that it’s good reading for all ages. In some ways Asterix is more enjoyable for me to read as an adult because I’m more familiar with the history of France (or Gaul) and Rome then I was as a child, and there are many jokes in Asterix that I think fly over the head of your average eight year old.

I’ve heard that Asterix is Europe’s equivalent to Mickey Mouse, or at least he is in France. Is that actually true?