I really can’t see as how you handled the situation at all, lieu. Looks more like the situation handled you. From what you’ve related above, it appears you could’ve walked away and contacted the law yourself in regard to the threats your neighbour apparently issued against your family.
But, no. You had to resort to violence. Actually, your intent to have a violent confrontation was evident, IMHO, from your act of going over to his place.
You did not relate here (perhaps you did in the deleted thread; however, it’s deleted and thus not available for perusal) what your wife meant by “almost hit.”
It also appears that there was no witness to the actual assault. You know, when you slugged your neighbour. Basically, it’s your word against his. Well, it’s basically your word against his and your self-admitted slugging him. It also appears that you’re going to be relying on the reputation this person has in the neighbourhood, said reputation you pretty well showed already was meaningless to you by your friendship with him.
Also, IMHO, the neighbour seems to be mentally ill.
You had plenty of opportunity to not go over there, you had plenty of opportunity to not stay there, and you certainly had plenty of opportunity not to break his nose.
I don’t join the rest of the crowd in bowing down to your so-called superiority. IMHO, you screwed up but good and the court is likely to let you know about it. And all this over something that almost happened, which you did not personally witness.
And before anyone commences freaking out: NO! I did not call your wife a liar. All I said is that you didn’t witness the event for which you went over and issued unlawful punishment.
My guess is that the court will find you guilty but that you might get lucky (actually, you probably will get lucky) and the judge will consider what you’ve related as mitigating factors. YES! The guy’s previous and public actions should be taken into account as a mitigating factor. Your belief that he threatened your family should definitely be taken into account as mitigating factors. They certainly shouldn’t be taken as exonerating you.
But that’s all IMHO. & possibly why it might be a good thing I haven’t served on a jury yet.