I’ve finally gotten around to organizing my MP3s. I need your advice on this problem. While should it be:
[ul]
[li]Beatles[/li][li]Beatles, The[/li][li]The Beatles[/li][/ul]
I’m using iTunes, so it doesn’t matter for searching. But I do want to stay consistent. I’m leaning towards “Beatles” i.e. not even considering the “The” as part of the name (except for “The The” I guess).
My system is modeled after Blockbuster’s, because I [del]served time [/del] worked there so long it started to make sense to me. “A”, “An” and “The” don’t count for alphabetizing, numbers come before letters in numerical order - unless the numbers are spelled out in letters, in which case they go in alphabetically. Letters are letters, even if pronounced as letters, and are alphabetized accordingly.
So it’d be:
5 For Fighting
10,000 Maniacs
Beatles, The
Boy Named Gomer, A
Emotional Fish, An
Five Man Electrical Band
Nine Inch Nails
The, The
Three Dog Night
U2
UB40
Who, The
But I’ve never been satisfied with the placement of U2. Does it go before UB40, because numbers (2) go before letters (B)? Or does that only count if the name starts with a number? I try not to lose sleep over it.
I agree as well. In the example given in the OP, “The” is part of the band name “The Beatles,” so it should always be included as part of the name. (Of course, it is standard when alphabetizing to move the article to the back.) In other cases, it is NOT part of the band name, such as “Nirvana.”
Bands are alphabetized by band name, ignore A, An, or The (except, as noted for The The).
Solo artists are alphabetized by last name.
Groups made up of two names (Simon and Garfunkle) are treated like groups if they use only last names, and alphabetized by the last name of the top billed artist if full names are concerned (e.g., Tim Fogleberg and Tim Weisberg goes under “F”). Probably the most considerate combination of that nature was when Alvin Lee made and album with Mylon LeFevre and both were billed.
Same for Beastie Boys, Buzzcocks, Cream, Counting Crows, Flamin’ Groovies, Foo Fighters, Gang of Four, Indigo Girls, Minutemen, Poster Children, Sex Pistols, Talking Heads, and Yeah Yeah Yeahs. (I think Prodigy and Small Faces skip the article too, but I’m not sure on those.)
Conversely, you usually hear just Smashing Pumpkins but they are technically the Smashing Pumpkins!
The result of my years programming (personally, not professionally) have ingrained in my head the basic order of things.
Thus, numbers and symbols (shift-number keys) come before letters because their ASCII character values are lower. Bands or albums starting with a number that is spelled out however (i.e. Eight Seconds, Seven and the Ragged Tiger) are alphabetized by their normal alphabetic positioning. This may seem inconsistent but I generally know which is which because I’m a bit anal about band/album names being accurate.
Regarding articles, I prefer them to be alphabetized irrespective of the article, but I want them named with their article in the forefront as was intended, because “Art of Noise, The” just looks wrong from an esthetic point of view. Fortunately iTunes knows all of this and alphabetizes just as I like it.
I’m a bit on the fence about symbols though. The first two album entries on my iTunes are:
808 State - (mixed) Azura
808 State - 10 X 10
These are the official names of the albums, but I think I’d prefer to see the first sorted in with the Ms.
I did work alphabetizing music* when that was his name (he changed it again, as that article mentions), and we put it under “Prince” as in “Prince, that idiot with the symbol name.” In my personal collection, I’d put it in the round file on the floor to the right of my desk. YMMV.
*There was a brief period after the buyout of several record stores when Blockbuster also carried CDs. I think they cut that shit out a while ago.
“The Definite Article” would make a good band name.
I agree that the article should be moved to the back in alphabetizing. My mp3 player sorts them as if “the” were the word so there are so many bands under the “t” listing. It’s annoying, but not enough for me to change it.
[QUOTE=davenportavengerMy mp3 player sorts them as if “the” were the word so there are so many bands under the “t” listing.[/QUOTE]
iPod is annoyingly inconstent about this. “The”-bands are alphabetized by the word after “The,” but “A” isn’t treated the same way. And when you drill down to albums, articles aren’t treated differently.
I also wish they’d include a flag to mark names of individual people (vs. band names) so they could be alphabetized by last name.
Normal except that 10,000 Maniacs ought to come before 5 For Fighting, as it’s not the value of the whole number you look at - you examine each digit respectively. At least that’s what’s standard in libraries. And U2 should definitely come before UB40, as 2 comes before B - numbers come before letters in alphabetical order.
Though I label my The The mp3s as The The, not The, The. Or , The, The.
Hey! You’re right! I’ve never noticed that before!
I’ve never liked the comma solution, but I didn’t want a glut of “T” entries. Now that I know iTunes ignores the “the” I’m leaving it firmly in place.
Now all that’s left is to come up with some way to decide when “The” actually IS part of the name (Smashing Pumpkins? Tragically Hip? The Pixies or not? sheesh!)
While we’re at it… is there any way to change the spelling of entries on my iPod? I’d rather have songs which begin with numbers spelled out, so that they don’t all pile up at the top of the SONGS display, for instance. Songs with parentheses at the beginning of their titles also accumulate there. Come to think of it, several songs I ripped from CDs have misspellings which I’d like to correct.