I picked up a book, There Is Intelligent Life on Mars, that is credited to “The Earl Nelson.” Yes, he was a descendant of Admiral Lord Nelson, though the Earldom came later. But that should make him just Lord Nelson or Albert Francis Joseph Horatio Nelson, 6th Earl Nelson.
Why The Earl Nelson? What does it connote that the shorter title would not?
I don’t think it has any particular connotation other than standard English usage: “the Prince of Wales”, “the Duke of Edinburgh” and “the Count of Monte Christo” all sound perfectly normal, I think. “The Earl Nelson” simply follows the same pattern.
It’s no different to “John Smith, Managing Director” being called “the Managing Director”.
My understanding is the “the” appends to the senior member of a line of nobility. The Duke of Wherever, has a son, Marquess Whist, A Brother Lord Didget, and so on. I’m having trouble finding a reference that spells it out. I can find examples that show it, but none that explicitly state it.
In eastern Europe, titles were held by the entire family. Count Exapno Mapcase’s sons would be Count John Mapcase, Count Leo Mapcase, Count Frederick Mapcase, etc.
In western Europe, a peerage is an office held by one person at a time. When the 4th Duke of Mapcase dies, his eldest son becomes the 5th Duke, and the rest of his descendants are technically commoners.
The heir to a peerage is allowed to use one of the peer’s lesser titles, but that is just a courtesy. The Duke of Whatever sits in Parliament, the Marquess Whist does not. Younger children of dukes and marquesses are “Lord Firstname Surname”, but again, that is just a courtesy. It confers no political power or legal privilege.
See if you can find a couple of books:
Titles,: Being a Guide to the Right Use of British titles and Honours, by Armiger. (No first name. It’s a pseudonym.)
Debrett’s Correct Form: Standard Styles of Address for Everyone from Peers to Presidents, by Patrick Montague-Smith.
I looked and the “The” is included in many names of Earls on book covers. I think what made it look odd is that most Earls are of places, i.e. The Earl of Birkenfeld. Some, however, are like Nelson, the Earl Surname. The lack of the “of” made it look weird.
“It should be noted that although most peers of this rank are Earls ‘of’ Somewhere, there is a significant number that are not.”
Nelson is one of the ones which is not. Looking at the list of those that aren’t, they all seem to be earldoms awarded for some military or civic achievement, and they take the form Earl Lastname, rather than Earl of a traditional British county.
In case you’re curious, here’s the list of earls who don’t take that form. In most cases, their names should be familiar:
Alexander of Tunis, Annesley, Attlee, Baldwin of Bewdley, Bathurst, Beatty, Belmore, Cadogan, Cairns, Castle Stewart, Cathcart, Cawdor, Cowley, De La Warr, Ferrers, Fortescue, Granville, Grey, Haig, Howe, Jellicoe, Kitchener of Khartoum, Lloyd George of Dwyfor, Mountbatten of Burma, Nelson, Peel, Russell, St Aldwyn, Spencer, Temple of Stowe, Waldegrave and Winterton.
If you’re curious as to why, btw, in the English peerage, Viscounts were always Viscount X. In the Scottish, they were Viscount of X. However, most Scottish Viscounts have adopted English practice. Those two are the only two to not.
Nitpick: The present Earl Nelson is not a descendant of the famous Admiral Horatio Nelson (who had no legitimate children), nor even of the 1st Earl Nelson (Horatio’s brother William, whose legitimate issue also went extinct). Instead he is a descendant of the 2nd Earl, Thomas Bolton (nephew of Horatio and William), who changed his surname to ‘Nelson’ when he was earled.
Allowing an Earldom to be inherited by a brother, let alone via a sister, was a special favor, but no posthumous honour was too great for the man who won the Battle of Trafalgar. The same special remainder was specified when the Admiral was given his 2nd Barony in 1801, after winning the Battle of Copenhagen. Thus the 6th Earl Nelson of Trafalgar and of Merton was also the 7th Baron Nelson of the Nile and of Hilborough.
The previous answers in this thread are surely correct (and interesting), but I’d add that there may be an added incentive in avoiding simply putting “Earl Nelson” on a book jacket, as this looks to many (especially non-Brits) as a simple given name and surname, rather akin to former basketball star Earl Monroe.
Oh, and Derleth — groan! You may be in Montana, but you talk like someone from Archie Bunkers’ Queens…
That may well be so, but insisting on the formalities can also cause at least a raised eyebrow or two here in the UK as well. I heard of a university where one senior academic was given a peerage and announced at some committee meeting that the minutes of the previous meeting should have referred to him as “The Lord X” rather than just “Lord X”. After that, the chair of the meeting spent half the meeting referring to everyone there as The Professor A, The Mrs B, The Dr. C, and so on, until the point was made.
Sheriff of Nottingham, in gratitude for your faithful service, I shall knight thee.
You’re most gracious, Majesty.
In the name of my most royal Majesty, I knight thee.
[Conk] Arise, Sir Loin of Beef.
[Conk] Arise, Earl of Cloves.
[Conk] Arise, Duke of Brittingham.
[Conk] Arise, Baron of Munchausen.
[Conk] Arise, Essence of Myrrh…
[Conk] Milk of Magnesia…
[Conk] Quarter of ten.