That’s like saying that a tuning fork will produce silence each time it is struck. LG doesn’t impose itself on anyone, citizen or not.
Well, I just asked the Redcoat we have quartered upstairs, and he says you’re missing the big picture.
Even granting you that for the sake of argument, you’re ruining your own case. If people form armies and go around building empires, then that is definitively not libertarian. Therefore, your assertion that libertarian societies would do that falls flat.
Why didn’t you say that to start with? Why all this catty word play? Have you decided that whatever I write, you will begin by disagreeing?
I agree. But according to you, he was free to choose. Therefore, no one exercised their might against him.
What a joke! Say, have you done a detailed analysis of Pearle Vision? Do you know exactly what it is they have done and how you would improve it? I want that answer right away. That’s in reference, of course, to your demand that I provide you detailed economic analysis of Libertaria, a hypothetical entity. And you cannot even provide detailed analysis of a real place that you fancy you could run better than its present officers.
Their actions wouldn’t even BE illegal unless they used deception or force in their practices.
Oh, please. One of those was an op-ed piece, and none of them provided the content of any law, regulation, rule, order, or ordinance. I’ll ask you once again to answer the question. You have claimed to have ready access to any law, regulation, rule, order, or ordinance on the books. Tell me what they are. And you already know Libertaria’s. You even just said how many words it is.
Another opinion piece, and this time from a right-wing gossip rag. But I already said he’d likely get around the flag burning, but he’s still stuck with resisting. What you claimed was that people aren’t “punished” for burning the flag. If being arrested and dragged to jail with trumped up charges of resisting isn’t punishment, then why are you bitching in the other thread about being arrested by Libertarian enforcers? And what about the dozens of other cases I linked you to? They are compiled by people who support illegalization of flag burning. They’re bragging about harassing people like Mr. Stout.
Really? Perhaps you’re just disagreeing to disagree. I mean, if he were burning charcoal and fixing people hamburgers, would your reasoning still apply? Haul his ass away and charge him with all that crap?
Unanswered in the sense of unfulfilled, and you knew that was what I meant. Even the portion you quoted proves what I said. You, as an individual, have no right to protection. Too bad for the ladies, I reckon, that they were not “the public at large”.
The most disingenuous statement from you yet. This entire discussion, from the get-go, is premised on the 8 words that you so often reference: “Every citizen shall be guaranteed freedom from coercion.” Why are you just now making such an argument? If you held the position genuinely, it would have been your first.
For the umpteenth time, it does that only when it knows for certain that the person is guilty.
What window? What are you talking about?
Cite?
What the…? It is never okay for you to damage my property, unless you are acting in response to my initial force. Period.
It is against board policy to discuss who is on our ignore lists.
Incidentally, you made no comment whatsoever about the definition of “will”. Did you read any of the material? Am I again wasting (an awful lot of) time with you? You promised a good faith discussion if I resumed communications with you. Honor your word, or else I will honor mine.