Indeed, it is not that simple Mitt, And yes, your group did say that we should get heavy weapons to the revels in Syria, forgetting the step to be very cautious on who to give those weapons, of course when cornered Mitt is just talking from the other mouth right now.
He is, in a way, because a blithering, lying idiot is tied in the polls. But it’s better than sitting back in serene confidence, like he did in Debate 1.
Oops… that Middle East map placemat was a markdown on the seconds table.
How?
Romney: We’ll provide LEADERSHIP.
HOOWWW?!
Romney: Trust me. We’ll provide leadership.
I wasn’t lumping them in with the ME, Romney was. But thanks for assuming what my character is.
“Mr. Obama, any regrets on Egypt (and Mubarek’s ouster)?”
Who the hell would say yes to that?
That’s the top thing about Mittens that bugs me. He cannot be pinned down on anything(!).
Obama: “Experiments in nation building in places like Iraq…”
Uh, wow. We just pulled out the globe to double-check, and of course you’re right. Syria and Iran don’t even share a border. Maybe he meant Iraq’s route to the sea?
Oh, now Obama is supposed to have Second Sight? Oy
I guess he is talking about the Mediterranean sea, He is just accepting that Bush the lesser did create a satellite of Iran in Iraq?
It sounds like Romney agrees with Obama on a lot of things.
Now, he’s talking about the US economy?
WTF
This man cannot stay on topic. Holy…
Mitt tries to drag economy into the conversation. Bad Mitt!
Romney apparently has just said that our purpose is to bring peace to the world.
Hope he brings a lunch.
Mitt- upper lip sweat. Nice.
Now Mitt thinks we should have been psychic and predicted the Arab Spring.
From principles to peace to domestic economy? Man is a word pretzel maker.
Nice steering it into the economy, Romney. I’m impressed. I was wondering how you’d spin the foreign policy debate back to the economy.
Iran, Iraq, same diff right?